Suppr超能文献

晚期充血性心力衰竭患者QRS波离散度和QT离散度与心脏性死亡及猝死死亡率的关系。

Relation of dispersion of QRS and QT in patients with advanced congestive heart failure to cardiac and sudden death mortality.

作者信息

Anastasiou-Nana M I, Nanas J N, Karagounis L A, Tsagalou E P, Alexopoulos G E, Toumanidis S, Gerali S, Stamatelopoulos S F, Moulopoulos S D

机构信息

University of Athens School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, "Alexandra" Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2000 May 15;85(10):1212-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00730-x.

Abstract

This study examined the usefulness of 01 and QRS dispersion in the prognosis of patients with advanced congestive heart failure (CHF). One hundred four patients in New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV, with a left ventricular ejection fraction of <35%, and untreated with antiarrhythmic drugs, were followed prospectively. QRS and QT dispersion were defined as the maximum difference in QRS and QT interval duration, respectively, measured on all leads of standard 12-lead electrocardiograms. The end points of the study were non-sudden and sudden cardiac mortality. During an average follow-up of 20 months, there were 13 non-sudden and 10 sudden deaths. The average QRS duration was significantly longer in nonsurvivors than in survivors (125 ¿ 34 vs 113 ¿ 34 ms, respectively, p <0.04). Similar results were obtained with 01 dispersion (95 ¿ 48 ms vs 78 ¿ 31 ms, respectively, p <0.03) and QRS dispersion (54 ¿ 17 ms vs 46 16 ms, respectively, p <0.02). Furthermore, patients who died suddenly had significantly greater QRS dispersion than patients who survived (56 ¿ 13 vs 46 ¿ 16 ms, respectively, p <0.02). In a multivariate analysis, QT and QRS dispersion were both independent predictors of non-sudden cardiac death (p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively), and QRS dispersion was also an independent predictor of sudden cardiac death (p = 0.04). Death rate in patients with 01 dispersion >90 ms was 2.8-fold higher than those with 01 dispersion 90 ms (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.2 to 6.4). Similarly, the death rate in patients with QRS dispersion >46 ms was 3.9-fold higher than in those with QRS dispersion 46 ms (95% Cl 1.6 to 9.5). These findings suggest that QT and QRS dispersion are useful predictors of mortality in patients with advanced CHF. ¿2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

摘要

本研究探讨了QT离散度和QRS离散度在晚期充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者预后评估中的作用。前瞻性随访了104例纽约心脏协会心功能分级为II至IV级、左心室射血分数<35%且未接受抗心律失常药物治疗的患者。QRS离散度和QT离散度分别定义为标准12导联心电图所有导联上QRS间期和QT间期持续时间的最大差值。研究终点为非心源性猝死和心源性猝死。在平均20个月的随访期内,有13例非心源性猝死和10例心源性猝死。非存活者的平均QRS时限显著长于存活者(分别为125±34 ms和113±34 ms,p<0.04)。QT离散度(分别为95±48 ms和78±31 ms,p<0.03)和QRS离散度(分别为54±17 ms和46±16 ms,p<0.02)也得到了类似结果。此外,心源性猝死患者的QRS离散度显著大于存活患者(分别为56±13 ms和46±16 ms,p<0.02)。多因素分析显示,QT离散度和QRS离散度均为非心源性猝死的独立预测因素(分别为p = 0.01和p = 0.001),QRS离散度也是心源性猝死的独立预测因素(p = 0.04)。QT离散度>90 ms患者的死亡率比QT离散度≤90 ms患者高2.8倍(95%置信区间[CI] 1.2至6.4)。同样,QRS离散度>46 ms患者的死亡率比QRS离散度≤46 ms患者高3.9倍(95%CI 1.6至9.5)。这些研究结果提示,QT离散度和QRS离散度是晚期CHF患者死亡率的有效预测指标。©2000年由医学文摘社出版。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验