• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用复合桩修复的根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性。

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.

作者信息

Newman Marcela P, Yaman Peter, Dennison Joseph, Rafter Mary, Billy Edward

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich 48109, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):360-7. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.75.

DOI:10.1067/mpr.2003.75
PMID:12690348
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The most recent application of fiber-reinforced composites involves their use as post and core systems to restore endodontically treated teeth. Even though this last application has been advertised and used clinically by many dentists, there is very little information regarding the physical properties of these post systems.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of 3 fiber-reinforced composite post systems on the fracture resistance and mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety maxillary central incisors were divided into 8 experimental groups and 1 stainless steel (ParaPost) control group of 10 specimens each. Eighty teeth were assigned to 2 main experimental groups called "narrow" and "flared" canals. For the narrow canal group, post spaces were prepared with the corresponding reamer to restore the teeth with FibreKor, Luscent anchors, and Ribbond posts of 1.5 mm, 1.6 mm, and 2.0 mm in diameter, respectively. For the flared canals group thin-walled canals were simulated. Teeth for the flared canals were restored with the same posts but were cemented into tapered 2 mm wide canals created with a tapered diamond bur. Prefabricated posts (FibreKor and Luscent anchors) for narrow and flared canals were cemented with an autopolymerized resin cement and a flowable composite, respectively, whereas customized Ribbond posts were luted with a light-polymerized flowable composite for both canal types. An additional set of 20 Ribbond posts with coronal portions of variable size and shape referred to as "Ribbond nonstandardized" were also prepared and evaluated. Specimens were loaded to failure (kg) with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.05 cm/min until failure occurred. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Student t tests (P<.05).

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between flared and narrow canals in mean load to failure between the post systems except for the Ribbond posts (P<.01). For the narrow canal, the mean load ranged from a low of 4.55 (+/-1.49) kg for the Ribbond standard to a high of 12.9 (+/-1.64) kg for the Luscent anchors. For the flared canal the low mean was 9.04 (+/-1.76) kg for FibreKor and the high was equal for both Luscent anchors and Ribbond standard, 12.87 (+/-2.69) and 12.87 (+/-3.54), respectively. Overall, the ParaPost control group had the highest load value (18.33 +/- 3.27 kg) (P<.05). Ribbond nonstandardized had a mean load to failure of 24.91 (+/-11.53) Kg for the narrow canal group and 31.95 (+/-11.98) kg for the flared canal. Results from these groups were excluded from the statistical analysis because of the uncontrolled core sizes and high standard deviations. No root fractures occurred in any of the experimental groups.

CONCLUSION

Results from the study show that the load to failure of the stainless steel posts were significantly stronger than all the composite posts studied. However, the mode of failure or deflection of the fiber-reinforced composite posts is protective to the remaining tooth structure.

摘要

问题陈述

纤维增强复合材料的最新应用是将其用作桩核系统来修复经牙髓治疗的牙齿。尽管这种最新应用已被许多牙医在临床上宣传和使用,但关于这些桩系统物理性能的信息却非常少。

目的

本研究的目的是比较3种纤维增强复合桩系统对经牙髓治疗牙齿的抗折性和失效模式的影响。

材料与方法

将90颗上颌中切牙分为8个实验组和1个不锈钢(ParaPost)对照组,每组10个样本。80颗牙齿被分配到2个主要实验组,称为“窄”根管组和“喇叭口状”根管组。对于窄根管组,用相应的扩孔钻制备桩道,分别用直径为1.5 mm、1.6 mm和2.0 mm的FibreKor、Luscent anchors和Ribbond桩修复牙齿。对于喇叭口状根管组,模拟薄壁根管。用相同的桩修复喇叭口状根管的牙齿,但用锥形金刚砂车针制备的2 mm宽的锥形根管将其粘固。窄根管和喇叭口状根管的预制桩(FibreKor和Luscent anchors)分别用自凝树脂粘固剂和流动复合树脂粘固,而定制的Ribbond桩则用光固化流动复合树脂为两种根管类型粘固。还制备并评估了另外一组20个冠部尺寸和形状可变的Ribbond桩,称为“Ribbond非标准化桩”。用万能试验机以0.05 cm/min的十字头速度对样本加载直至失效(kg)。数据采用方差分析和Student t检验进行分析(P<0.05)。

结果

统计分析显示,除Ribbond桩外(P<0.01),桩系统之间喇叭口状根管和窄根管的平均失效载荷无显著差异。对于窄根管,平均载荷范围从Ribbond标准桩的低至4.55(±1.49)kg到Luscent anchors桩的高至12.9(±1.64)kg。对于喇叭口状根管,FibreKor桩的低平均载荷为9.04(±1.76)kg,Luscent anchors桩和Ribbond标准桩的高平均载荷相等,分别为12.87(±2.69)kg和12.87(±3.54)kg。总体而言,ParaPost对照组的载荷值最高(18.33±3.27 kg)(P<0.05)。窄根管组Ribbond非标准化桩的平均失效载荷为24.91(±11.53)kg,喇叭口状根管组为31.95(±11.98)kg。由于核心尺寸不受控制且标准差较高,这些组的结果被排除在统计分析之外。所有实验组均未发生牙根折断。

结论

研究结果表明,不锈钢桩的失效载荷明显强于所有研究的复合桩。然而,纤维增强复合桩的失效模式或挠度对剩余牙体结构具有保护作用。

相似文献

1
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.用复合桩修复的根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):360-7. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.75.
2
Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems.经根管治疗且根管呈喇叭状并采用不同桩系统修复的牙齿的断裂强度。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(1):30-6; discussion 37. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00060.x.
3
In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.上颌切牙结构受损牙根中根管桩的体外比较
SADJ. 2011 Jun;66(5):220-3.
4
The effect of post type and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.桩核类型和长度对根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Mar;101(3):174-82. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60024-X.
5
Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.使用短纤维增强复合树脂直接修复严重受损的门牙。
J Dent. 2007 Sep;35(9):731-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
6
Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth.树脂基材料对根管治疗薄壁牙抗折性能的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):296-303. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60304-2.
7
Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro.体外使用碳纤维增强树脂桩系统修复的根管治疗牙的抗折性及初始失败模式
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Mar-Apr;14(2):141-5.
8
The effect of fiber dowel heights in resin composite cores on restoration failures of endodontically treated teeth.树脂复合材料桩核中纤维桩高度对根管治疗后牙齿修复失败的影响。
J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(2):63-9. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.2.63.
9
Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.桩核设计和套筒冠对根管治疗后的上颌中切牙抗折性能的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):368-73. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.73.
10
The effect of different posts on fracture strength of roots with vertical fracture and re-attached fragments.不同桩核修复体对纵折伴牙折块再附着后牙根抗折强度的影响
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Aug;37(8):615-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02086.x. Epub 2010 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD-CAM fabricated zirconia posts in endodontically treated teeth.CAD-CAM 制作的氧化锆桩在根管治疗牙中的适应性和抗折性的比较评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15348-3.
2
Mode of failure and finite element analysis of custom-made PEEK post-core (milled and pressed).定制聚醚醚酮桩核(铣削和压制)的失效模式及有限元分析
Odontology. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01084-7.
3
Fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically-treated permanent teeth restored with Ribbond posts vs other post systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
使用Ribbond桩与其他桩系统修复的根管治疗恒牙的抗折性和失败模式:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;50(1):e5. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e5. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
4
Fracture strength of cad-cam milled polyetheretherketone (PEEK) post-cores conventional post-cores; an study.CAD/CAM 铣削聚醚醚酮 (PEEK) 桩核的抗压强度:传统桩核的比较研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 5;12:e18012. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18012. eCollection 2024.
5
Surface strain at the cervical area and fracture strength of flared root canals reinforced using a zirconia tube and glass-fiber post.使用氧化锆管和玻璃纤维桩增强的喇叭形根管在颈部区域的表面应变和断裂强度。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1571-1577. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.12.012. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
6
Stress distribution pattern in two different no-post systems in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.根管治疗后的上颌中切牙两种不同无桩系统中的应力分布模式:三维有限元分析
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jun;27(6):572-576. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_135_24. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
7
Clinical Performance of Composite Resin Restorations of Primary Incisors with Extensive Carious Lesions Retained by Glass Fiber Post or Biological Post.玻璃纤维桩或生物桩保留的患有广泛龋损的乳前牙复合树脂修复体的临床性能
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov-Dec;16(6):850-857. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2722.
8
Fracture strength of endocrowns after thermomechanical aging.经过热机械老化后的嵌体的断裂强度。
Odontology. 2024 Jul;112(3):884-894. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00884-z. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
9
Scientific mapping of hotspots and trends of post and core research based on the Web of Science: A bibliometric analysis.基于科学网的博士后及核心研究热点与趋势的科学图谱:文献计量分析
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 19;10(1):e23786. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23786. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
10
Fracture Resistance of Different Post-Core Systems: An Study.不同桩核系统的抗折性:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S239-S243. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_472_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.