Suppr超能文献

医生对癌症易感性进行基因检测的情况:一项全国性调查结果

Physician use of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: results of a national survey.

作者信息

Wideroff Louise, Freedman Andrew N, Olson Lorayn, Klabunde Carrie N, Davis William, Srinath Kadaba P, Croyle Robert T, Ballard-Barbash Rachel

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7344, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Apr;12(4):295-303.

Abstract

Genetic testing for inherited germ-line mutations associated with cancer susceptibility is an emerging technology in medical practice. Limited information is currently available about physician use of cancer susceptibility tests (CSTs). In 1999-2000, a nationally representative survey was conducted to estimate prevalence of CST use by United States physicians and assess demographic, training, practice setting, and practice patterns associated with use. A stratified random sample of clinicians in eight specialties was selected from a file of all licensed physicians. In total, 1251 physicians, including 820 in primary care and 431 in tertiary care, responded to a 15-min questionnaire by mail, telephone, fax, or Internet (response rate = 71.0%). In the previous 12 months, 31.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 28.5-33.9] overall, including 30.6% (95% CI, 27.5-33.7) in primary care and 33.4% (95% CI, 27.9-38.9) in tertiary care, had ordered CSTs or referred patients elsewhere for risk assessment or testing. More physicians referred patients elsewhere [26.7% (95% CI, 24.2-29.2)] than directly ordered tests [7.9% (95% CI, 6.3-9.5)]. Factors associated with ordering or referring included practice location in the Northeast [odds ratio (OR), 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.63%], feeling qualified to recommend CSTs (OR, 1.96; 95% CI = 1.41-2.72), receiving CST advertising materials (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.40-2.78%), and most notably, having patients who asked whether they can or should get tested (OR, 5.52; 95% CI, 3.97-7.67%). Lower CST use was associated with not knowing if there were local testing and counseling facilities (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.66%). These findings underscore the importance of establishing effective clinical approaches to test use and promoting physician education to facilitate communication with patients about cancer genetics.

摘要

检测与癌症易感性相关的遗传性种系突变的基因检测技术在医学实践中是一项新兴技术。目前关于医生使用癌症易感性检测(CST)的信息有限。在1999 - 2000年,进行了一项全国性代表性调查,以估计美国医生使用CST的流行率,并评估与使用相关的人口统计学、培训、执业环境和执业模式。从所有持牌医生档案中选取了八个专业的临床医生分层随机样本。共有1251名医生,包括820名初级保健医生和431名三级保健医生,通过邮件、电话、传真或互联网回复了一份15分钟的问卷(回复率 = 71.0%)。在过去12个月中,总体上有31.2%[95%置信区间(CI),28.5 - 33.9],包括初级保健中的30.6%(95% CI,27.5 - 33.7)和三级保健中的33.4%(95% CI,27.9 - 38.9)曾开具CST或将患者转诊至其他地方进行风险评估或检测。转诊患者的医生[26.7%(95% CI,24.2 - 29.2)]比直接开具检测的医生[7.9%(95% CI,6.3 - 9.5)]更多。与开具检测或转诊相关的因素包括在东北部的执业地点[优势比(OR),2.30;95% CI,1.46 - 3.63%]、觉得有资格推荐CST(OR,1.96;95% CI = 1.41 - 2.72)、收到CST广告材料(OR,1.97;95% CI,1.40 - 2.78%),最显著的是,有患者询问他们是否能够或应该接受检测(OR,5.52;95% CI,3.97 - 7.67%)。较低的CST使用率与不知道是否有当地检测和咨询设施相关(OR,0.39;95% CI,0.23 - 0.66%)。这些发现强调了建立有效的检测使用临床方法以及促进医生教育以促进与患者就癌症遗传学进行沟通的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验