Mayhew Terry, Griffiths Gareth, Habermann Anja, Lucocq John, Emre Nil, Webster Paul
School of Biomedical Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, E Floor, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Histochem Cell Biol. 2003 Apr;119(4):333-41. doi: 10.1007/s00418-003-0523-6. Epub 2003 Apr 15.
Quantitative immunoelectron microscopy of gold label in intracellular compartments often involves calculating labelling densities (LDs). These are related to antigen concentrations and usually refer gold particle counts to the sizes of compartments on sections (for example, golds per microm(2) of organelle profile area or per microm of membrane trace length). Here, we show how LD values can be estimated more simply (without estimating areas or lengths) and also how observed and expected LD values can be used to calculate a relative labelling index (RLI) for each compartment and then test statistically for preferential (non-random) labelling. For random labelling, RLI=1. Compartment size is estimated stereologically by superimposing random test points (which hit organelle profiles in proportion to their area) or test lines (which intersect membrane traces in proportion to their length). By this means, the observed LD of a compartment (LD(obs)) can be expressed simply as golds per test point (organelles) or per intersection (membranes). Furthermore, the LD obtained by dividing total golds (on all compartments) by total points or intersections (on all compartments) is the value to be expected (LD(exp)) when compartments label randomly. For each compartment, RLI=LD(obs)/LD(exp). Statistical analysis is undertaken by comparing observed distributions of golds with predicted random distributions (calculated from point or intersection counts). A compartment is preferentially labelled if two criteria are met: (1) its RLI>1 (i.e. LD(obs) is greater than LD(exp)) and (2) its partial chi-squared value makes a substantial contribution to total chi-squared value. This approach provides a simple and efficient way of comparing LDs in different compartments. Its utility is illustrated using data from VPARP and LAMP-1 labelling experiments.
细胞内区室中金标记的定量免疫电子显微镜检查通常涉及计算标记密度(LDs)。这些与抗原浓度相关,通常将金颗粒计数与切片上区室的大小相关联(例如,每平方微米细胞器轮廓面积或每微米膜迹线长度的金颗粒数)。在这里,我们展示了如何更简单地估计LD值(无需估计面积或长度),以及如何使用观察到的和预期的LD值来计算每个区室的相对标记指数(RLI),然后进行统计测试以确定是否存在优先(非随机)标记。对于随机标记,RLI = 1。通过叠加随机测试点(其与细胞器轮廓的接触比例与其面积成正比)或测试线(其与膜迹线的相交比例与其长度成正比),从立体学角度估计区室大小。通过这种方式,区室的观察到的LD(LD(obs))可以简单地表示为每个测试点(细胞器)或每个交点(膜)的金颗粒数。此外,将所有区室上的总金颗粒数除以所有区室上的总点数或交点数得到的LD是区室随机标记时预期的值(LD(exp))。对于每个区室,RLI = LD(obs)/LD(exp)。通过将观察到的金颗粒分布与预测的随机分布(根据点数或交点数计算)进行比较来进行统计分析。如果满足两个标准,则区室被优先标记:(1)其RLI>1(即LD(obs)大于LD(exp)),以及(2)其部分卡方值对总卡方值有重大贡献。这种方法提供了一种简单有效的方式来比较不同区室中的LDs。使用来自VPARP和LAMP - 1标记实验的数据说明了其效用。