Division of Cell Biology and Immunology, School of Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
J Histochem Cytochem. 2010 Oct;58(10):917-27. doi: 10.1369/jhc.2010.956243. Epub 2010 May 10.
In immunoelectron microscopy (immuno-EM) on ultrathin sections, gold particles are used for localization of molecular components of cells. These particles are countable, and quantitative methods have been established to estimate and evaluate the density and distribution of "raw" gold particle counts from a single uncontrolled labeling experiment. However, these raw counts are composed of two distinct elements: particles that are specific (specific labeling) and particles that are not (nonspecific labeling) for the target component. So far, approaches for assessment of specific labeling and for correction of raw gold particle counts to reveal specific labeling densities and distributions have not attracted much attention. Here, we discuss experimental strategies for determining specificity in immuno-EM, and we present methods for quantitative assessment of (1) the probability that an observed gold particle is specific for the target, (2) the density of specific labeling, and (3) the distribution of specific labeling over a series of compartments. These methods should be of general utility for researchers investigating the distribution of cellular components using on-section immunogold labeling.
在超薄切片的免疫电子显微镜(immuno-EM)中,金颗粒用于定位细胞的分子成分。这些颗粒是可计数的,已经建立了定量方法来估计和评估来自单个不受控制的标记实验的“原始”金颗粒计数的密度和分布。然而,这些原始计数由两个不同的元素组成:针对目标成分的特异性(特异性标记)和非特异性(非特异性标记)的颗粒。到目前为止,评估特异性标记和纠正原始金颗粒计数以揭示特异性标记密度和分布的方法并没有引起太多关注。在这里,我们讨论了确定免疫电子显微镜中特异性的实验策略,并介绍了定量评估以下内容的方法:(1) 观察到的金颗粒针对目标的特异性概率,(2) 特异性标记的密度,以及 (3) 一系列隔室中特异性标记的分布。这些方法对于使用切片免疫金标记研究细胞成分分布的研究人员应该具有普遍的适用性。