Aukee Pauliina, Penttinen Jorma, Airaksinen Olavi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Middle-Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä 40620, Finland.
Maturitas. 2003 Apr 25;44(4):253-7. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(03)00044-6.
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is commonly used in combination with biofeedback devices for stress urinary incontinence. A new electromyography (EMG)-based home-use device for PFMT is tested for healthy and stress incontinent patients.
Altogether 31 women with genuine stress incontinence (GSI) and 35 controls without urinary symptoms were measured with a vaginal surface EMG probe. EMG activity during three rapid contractions (5 s) in supine and standing positions were observed.
Mean values of three rapid contractions were 17.0 microV (range 6.5-59.0, S.D. 10.5) in the supine position and 12.9 microV (range 5.0-33.0, S.D. 5.9) in the standing position among incontinent patients and 19.5 microV (range 9.0-43.5, S.D. 8.4) and 18.2 microV (range 8.0-43.5, S.D. 8.7) among the controls, respectively. A significant difference (P=0.006) was found in the mean values of three rapid contractions in the standing position between GSI patients and asymptomatic women. In regression analysis, EMG values were dependent on age (P=0.004 in the supine, P=0.009 in the standing) in both groups, but not on parity, body mass index (BMI) or episiotomies.
In the study groups, the EMG activity of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) decreased during aging. Although the tested surface EMG device showed a tendency that incontinent patients have lower PFM activities especially in the standing position, the value of surface EMG method as a diagnostic tool is not well established. However, the tested EMG-based device for PFMT will be helpful as guidance for incontinent patients.
盆底肌训练(PFMT)通常与生物反馈设备联合用于治疗压力性尿失禁。一种新型的基于肌电图(EMG)的家用PFMT设备在健康和压力性尿失禁患者中进行了测试。
使用阴道表面肌电图探头对31名真性压力性尿失禁(GSI)女性和35名无泌尿系统症状的对照者进行测量。观察仰卧位和站立位时三次快速收缩(5秒)期间的肌电图活动。
失禁患者仰卧位时三次快速收缩的平均值为17.0微伏(范围6.5 - 59.0,标准差10.5),站立位时为12.9微伏(范围5.0 - 33.0,标准差5.9);对照组仰卧位时为19.5微伏(范围9.0 - 43.5,标准差8.4),站立位时为18.2微伏(范围8.0 - 43.5,标准差8.7)。在站立位时,GSI患者和无症状女性三次快速收缩的平均值存在显著差异(P = 0.006)。回归分析显示,两组中肌电图值均与年龄有关(仰卧位P = 0.004,站立位P = 0.009),但与产次、体重指数(BMI)或会阴切开术无关。
在研究组中,盆底肌(PFMs)的肌电图活动随年龄增长而降低。尽管测试的表面肌电图设备显示失禁患者尤其是站立位时盆底肌活动较低的趋势,但表面肌电图方法作为诊断工具的价值尚未明确确立。然而,测试的基于肌电图的PFMT设备将有助于为失禁患者提供指导。