Zeng Fang-yin, Zhang Yu-ming, Yang Yang, Wang Qian
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Nanfang Hospital, First Military Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2003 Apr;23(4):369-71.
To evaluate the clinical applicability of bromcresol purple (BCP) method in serum albumin measurement, and to investigate the possibility to render the results thus obtained in agreement with those by traditional bromcresol green (BCG) method.
The assessment of BCP method was conducted in comparison with BCG method by measuring their linearity ranges, coefficients of variation (CV) in batch and between batches, recovery rates, and resistance to interference by certain normal clinical factors.
The linearity of BCP method was 10 to 80 g/L, CV was 0.95% in batch and 3.03% between batches, with an average recovery rate of 99.4%, showing no obvious interference by 252 micromol/L bilirubin, 4% Trilitid, or by 4 g/L hemoglobin separately. Close correlation was observed between the measurement results by the 2 methods (y=1.08x+5.98). The adult reference range was 34-49 g/L by BCP method, which was 6 g/L lower, on average, than that by traditional BCG method.
BCP method is more specific than BCG method in serum albumin measurement, and the results of the former can be easily and accurately converted so as to be comparable with the results by the latter method.
评估溴甲酚紫(BCP)法测定血清白蛋白的临床适用性,并探讨使该方法所得结果与传统溴甲酚绿(BCG)法结果一致的可能性。
通过测量BCP法和BCG法的线性范围、批内和批间变异系数(CV)、回收率以及对某些正常临床因素干扰的耐受性,对BCP法进行评估并与BCG法作比较。
BCP法的线性范围为10至80 g/L,批内CV为0.95%,批间CV为3.03%,平均回收率为99.4%,分别显示不受252 μmol/L胆红素、4%三酰甘油或4 g/L血红蛋白的明显干扰。两种方法的测量结果之间存在密切相关性(y = 1.08x + 5.98)。BCP法测定的成人参考范围为34 - 49 g/L,平均比传统BCG法低6 g/L。
在血清白蛋白测定中,BCP法比BCG法更具特异性,且前者的结果可轻松准确地进行转换,以便与后者的结果进行比较。