Suppr超能文献

颈椎侧块钢板固定的稳定性:单皮质与双皮质螺钉植入

Cervical stability with lateral mass plating: unicortical versus bicortical screw purchase.

作者信息

Muffoletto Anthony J, Yang Jinping, Vadhva Mukta, Hadjipavlou Alexander G

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA. mailto:

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):778-81.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study using human cadaveric cervical spines was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the cervical stability achieved with lateral mass fixation using unicortical screw purchase is comparable with that obtained with lateral mass fixation using bicortical screw purchase.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical lateral mass fixation has traditionally required bicortical screw fixation, which is associated with potential injury to the vertebral vessels and cervical nerve roots. Unicortical fixation eliminates these possible complications. Limited stability studies suggest that unicortical fixation in the lateral masses provides stability comparable with that of bicortical fixation. However, no comprehensive biomechanical study has compared the cervical stability between bicortical and unicortical lateral mass fixations.

METHODS

A total of 11 human cadaveric cervical spinal sections between C3 and C5 were tested in flexion-extension, torsion, and lateral bending modes, both with and without laminectomy, on an MTS machine. The lateral masses were plated and tested with bicortical screws in all 11 specimens. Long (14 mm) unicortical screws were used in 8, and short (10 mm) screws were used in 6 of the 11 specimens. Displacement then was determined in millimeters (of flexion-extension and lateral bending) and degrees (of torsion) for each value of applied torque (0.45, 0.9, 1.35, 1.8 Nm). Two-way analysis of variance using unequal data sets then was applied.

RESULTS

Analysis demonstrates that bicortical constructs were, on the average, stiffer than unicortical constructs in most bending modes. No significant differences were found, however, between bicortical constructs and long unicortical constructs without laminectomy. In the presence of a destabilizing laminectomy, a difference was found in the lateral bending mode. More differences were found between bicortical and short unicortical constructs both with and without laminectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical lateral mass fixation with "long" (up to but not through the anterior lateral mass cortex) unicortical Magerl screws may provide an acceptable and safe alternative to bicortical screw fixation.

摘要

研究设计

采用人体尸体颈椎进行生物力学研究。

目的

确定单皮质螺钉置入侧块固定所获得的颈椎稳定性是否与双皮质螺钉置入侧块固定所获得的稳定性相当。

背景资料总结

传统上颈椎侧块固定需要双皮质螺钉固定,这与椎动脉和颈神经根的潜在损伤有关。单皮质固定可消除这些可能的并发症。有限的稳定性研究表明,侧块单皮质固定提供的稳定性与双皮质固定相当。然而,尚无全面的生物力学研究比较双皮质和单皮质侧块固定之间的颈椎稳定性。

方法

在一台MTS机器上,对11个C3至C5节段的人体尸体颈椎标本进行屈伸、扭转和侧弯模式测试,测试时均进行和不进行椎板切除术。在所有11个标本中,侧块均用双皮质螺钉进行钢板固定并测试。11个标本中的8个使用长(14毫米)单皮质螺钉,6个使用短(10毫米)螺钉。然后针对每个施加扭矩值(0.45、0.9、1.35、1.8牛米),以毫米(屈伸和侧弯)和度(扭转)为单位确定位移。然后对不等数据集应用双向方差分析。

结果

分析表明,在大多数弯曲模式下,双皮质结构平均比单皮质结构更硬。然而,在未进行椎板切除术的情况下,双皮质结构与长单皮质结构之间未发现显著差异。在存在不稳定椎板切除术的情况下,侧弯模式中发现了差异。在进行和未进行椎板切除术的情况下,双皮质和短单皮质结构之间发现了更多差异。

结论

使用“长”(直至但不穿透前外侧块皮质)单皮质马格尔螺钉进行颈椎侧块固定可能是双皮质螺钉固定的一种可接受且安全的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验