Justifying assisted suicide: comments on the ongoing debate.
作者信息
Urofsky M I
机构信息
Virginia Commonwealth University, USA.
出版信息
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy. 2000;14(2):893-943.
PMID:12705271
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Justifying assisted suicide: comments on the ongoing debate.为协助自杀辩护：对正在进行的辩论的评论
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy. 2000;14(2):893-943.
2
Responsible public policy at the end of life.临终阶段的负责任公共政策。
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev. 1998 Spring;75(3):557-94.
3
But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.但是，我们为什么要射杀马匹？：对死亡权利与安乐死的分析。
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights. 1994 Fall;12(1):115-61.
4
Protecting the right to live: international comparison of physician-assisted suicide systems.保护生命权：医师协助自杀制度的国际比较。
Indiana Int Comp Law Rev. 1997;7(2):433-65.
5
The right to assisted suicide and euthanasia.协助自杀和安乐死的权利。
Harv J Law Public Policy. 2000 Spring;23(2):599-710.
6
The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death.医生加速死亡行为的法律界限。
Buffalo Law Rev. 2000 Winter;48(1):83-173.
7
Autonomy and death.自主性与死亡。
Tulane Law Rev. 1996 Nov;71(1):45-137.
8
Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: safeguarding against the "slippery slope"--The Netherlands versus the United States.医生协助自杀与安乐死：防范“滑坡效应”——荷兰与美国之比较
Indiana Int Comp Law Rev. 2003;13(2):639-81.
9
Making our own decisions about death: competency should be paramount.就死亡问题自行做决定：行为能力应是首要考量因素。
Free Inq. 2005 Aug-Sep;25(5):36-8.
10
Is the Constitution a suicide pact?
Duquesne Law Rev. 1996 Fall;35(1):201-59.
Zotero 插件