The impact of prostate volume following neoadjuvant androgen deprivation on quality of life and voiding symptoms in patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE

Patients with large prostate volumes undergoing interstitial brachytherapy (BT) are currently believed to have worse urinary symptoms and quality of life (QOL) following the implant. We sought to determine if data from patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen ablation followed by BT at our institution supported this notion using a cross-sectional study design.

METHODS

From 14 March 1997 to 25 August 2000, 248 patients underwent neoadjuvant androgen ablation followed by BT monotherapy (BTM) or BT combined with external beam (BTC) for treatment of localized prostate cancer. FACT-G and AUASS questionnaires were mailed to all patients on 1 September 2001. Overall FACT-G scores along with the irritative (IAUA) and obstructive (OAUA) subscales of the AUASS were calculated for each patient. Prostate volume (one to two weeks prior to BT), number of seeds, and implant method (ultrasound or CT guided) were compared with the outcomes on the two validated instruments. All analyses were adjusted for time since procedure and patient age.

RESULTS

169 of 248 (68%) patients returned questionnaires. The median prostate volume was 37cc and number of seeds implanted was 95. Our data shows little correlation between total FACT-G or AUASS scores and volume of the prostate. Likewise, neither FACT-G nor IAUA scores appeared related to the number of seeds implanted. A correlation was seen when comparing number of seeds with OAUA scores, but this result appeared to be driven by the BTC group. Number of needles implanted did not appear to be related to total FACT-G scores. The number of needles inserted was related to both IAUA and OAUA scores in the BTC group, but not in BTM group.

CONCLUSION

Quality of life and urinary function scores do not appear to be strongly related to pre-implant prostate volume or method of implantation and thus patients should not be dissuaded from considering neoadjuvant androgen ablation followed by BT solely due to prostate size.