Depasse F, González de Suso M J, Lagoutte I, Fontcuberta J, Borrell M, Samama M M
LCL, Clinical Research Department, 78, avenue de Verdun, Ivry-sur-Seine 94200, France.
Thromb Res. 2003 Jan 25;109(2-3):109-17. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00141-5.
Pharmacokinetic profiles of bemiparin (3500 IU, anti-Xa) and tinzaparin (4500 IU, anti-Xa) administered subcutaneously to 12 healthy male volunteers were compared in a monocentric study. Each of the 12 subjects underwent successively the two low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) preparations in a randomised order and was considered as its own control. Anti-Xa activity, free and total tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and thromboplastin-thrombomodulin-mediated time were determined as main variables. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin clotting time, and anti-IIa activity were also determined. Bemiparin (3500 IU, anti-Xa) exerts a significantly more rapid, more potent, and more prolonged anti-Xa activity than tinzaparin (4500 IU, anti-Xa). The plasma level increase for free and total TFPI is significantly lower with bemiparin than with tinzaparin. Free and total TFPI peak levels occur earlier than anti-Xa activity peak levels for both LMWH preparations, but no statistical difference appeared between the two preparations for TFPI T(max). No significant effect was observed for both preparations for thromboplastin-thrombomodulin-mediated time. Subcutaneous injection of bemiparin exerts only minimal anti-IIa activity and does not prolong thrombin time, whereas tinzaparin elicits significant anti-IIa activity and prolongs thrombin clotting time. Bemiparin exerts a significantly lower prolongation of APTT than tinzaparin. No difference was observed for APTT prolongation T(max) between the two preparations. Globally, the overall tolerability of both formulations revealed no relevant adverse effects. In conclusion, bemiparin and tinzaparin are not bioequivalent. Bemiparin exerts an important and more prolonged anti-Xa activity in comparison with tinzaparin. An original finding of this study is the difference observed between the two formulations for free TFPI release.
在一项单中心研究中,比较了皮下注射给12名健康男性志愿者的贝米肝素(3500 IU,抗Xa)和替扎肝素(4500 IU,抗Xa)的药代动力学特征。12名受试者中的每一位都以随机顺序先后接受两种低分子量肝素(LMWH)制剂,并将其自身视为对照。将抗Xa活性、游离和总组织因子途径抑制物(TFPI)以及凝血活酶-血栓调节蛋白介导的时间确定为主要变量。还测定了活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、凝血酶凝血时间和抗IIa活性。贝米肝素(3500 IU,抗Xa)比替扎肝素(4500 IU,抗Xa)具有显著更快、更强和更持久的抗Xa活性。贝米肝素使游离和总TFPI的血浆水平升高显著低于替扎肝素。两种LMWH制剂的游离和总TFPI峰值水平均早于抗Xa活性峰值水平出现,但两种制剂的TFPI T(max)之间未出现统计学差异。两种制剂对凝血活酶-血栓调节蛋白介导的时间均未观察到显著影响。皮下注射贝米肝素仅产生极小的抗IIa活性且不延长凝血酶时间,而替扎肝素引发显著的抗IIa活性并延长凝血酶凝血时间。贝米肝素对APTT延长的程度显著低于替扎肝素。两种制剂之间在APTT延长T(max)方面未观察到差异。总体而言,两种制剂的总体耐受性均未显示出相关不良反应。总之,贝米肝素和替扎肝素不具有生物等效性。与替扎肝素相比,贝米肝素具有重要且更持久的抗Xa活性。本研究的一个原始发现是两种制剂在游离TFPI释放方面观察到的差异。