Antonijoan R M, Rico S, Martínez-González J, Borrell M, Valcarcel D, Fontcuberta J, Barbanoj M J
Centre d' lnvestigació de Medicaments, Institut de Recerca, Servei de Farmacologia Clínica, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Spain.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Dec;47(12):726-32. doi: 10.5414/cpp47726.
Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are antithrombotic drugs that differ on biochemical and pharmacological properties.
This study was conducted to compare the pharmacodynamic time-course of two LMWHs, bemiparin and enoxaparin, at high prophylactic doses.
This was an open, randomized, single-blind, cross-over study to compare the pharmacodynamic time-course, safety and tolerability of two LMWHs, bemiparin 3500 IU and enoxaparin 4000 IU at subcutaneous single doses in 12 healthy male volunteers. Anti-Xa activity (main biomarker of heparin activity), anti-IIa activity, total and free tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT) and thromboplastin-thrombomodulin mediated time (Tp-TmT) were investigated.
Bemiparin 3500 IU achieved more anti-Xa activity than enoxaparin 4000 IU, measured by the area under the curve (geometric mean AUC0t) (bemiparin 3.69 vs. enoxaparin 3.33 IU h/ml; p < 0.001). Maximum anti-Xa activity was reached at 3 hours and there were anti-Xa measurable levels up to 16 h after subcutaneous administration. Anti-Xa activity half-life was 5.44 hours for bemiparin and 4.71 hours for enoxaparin. Anti-IIa activity was above the limit of quantification (0.05 IU/ml) in only 2 volunteers after bemiparin and in 8 after enoxaparin. The "in-vivo" anti-Xa:IIa ratios were: bemiparin 37.9 (95% CI: 28.0 - 55.3, n = 2) and enoxaparin 16.3 (95% CI: 12.2 - 23.4, n = 8). Enoxaparin induced a higher release of total TFPI, but not on free TFPI, and a longer prolongation of APTT and TT (Emax) than bemiparin, with no differences between groups on Tp-TmT. Adverse events (one in each group) were mild and transient.
Bemiparin 3500 IU showed more anti-Xa activity and higher anti-Xa: anti-IIa relationship than enoxaparin 4000 IU in healthy volunteers. Both treatments were well tolerated.
低分子量肝素(LMWHs)是一类抗血栓药物,在生化和药理特性上存在差异。
本研究旨在比较两种低分子量肝素(苄丙酮香豆素和依诺肝素)在高预防剂量下的药效学时间进程。
这是一项开放、随机、单盲、交叉研究,旨在比较12名健康男性志愿者皮下单剂量给予3500 IU苄丙酮香豆素和4000 IU依诺肝素后两种低分子量肝素的药效学时间进程、安全性和耐受性。研究了抗Xa活性(肝素活性的主要生物标志物)、抗IIa活性、总组织因子途径抑制物和游离组织因子途径抑制物(TFPI)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、凝血酶时间(TT)以及凝血活酶-血栓调节蛋白介导时间(Tp-TmT)。
通过曲线下面积(几何平均AUC0t)测量,3500 IU苄丙酮香豆素比4000 IU依诺肝素具有更高的抗Xa活性(苄丙酮香豆素为3.69 vs.依诺肝素为3.33 IU·h/ml;p < 0.001)。皮下给药后3小时达到最大抗Xa活性,直至16小时仍有可测量的抗Xa水平。苄丙酮香豆素的抗Xa活性半衰期为5.44小时,依诺肝素为4.71小时。苄丙酮香豆素给药后仅2名志愿者的抗IIa活性高于定量限(0.05 IU/ml),依诺肝素给药后有8名志愿者如此。“体内”抗Xa:IIa比值分别为:苄丙酮香豆素37.9(95% CI:28.0 - 55.3,n = 2)和依诺肝素16.3(95% CI:12.2 - 23.4,n = 8)。依诺肝素诱导的总TFPI释放更高,但游离TFPI释放无差异,且APTT和TT(Emax)延长时间比苄丙酮香豆素更长,但两组在Tp-TmT上无差异。不良事件(每组各1例)轻微且短暂。
在健康志愿者中,3500 IU苄丙酮香豆素比4000 IU依诺肝素表现出更高的抗Xa活性和更高的抗Xa:抗IIa关系。两种治疗耐受性均良好。