Gunzburg R, Keller T S, Szpalski M, Vandeputte K, Spratt K F
Centennial Clinic, Antwerp, Belgium.
Eur Spine J. 2003 Apr;12(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0479-6. Epub 2002 Nov 30.
Less invasive decompressive surgery has emerged as a logical surgical treatment alternative to wide decompression of spinal stenosis. The clinical outcomes of such conservative surgical treatment, however, are not well known. The aim of the study was to evaluate short-term psychometric and functional outcomes after conservative decompressive surgery for lumbar canal stenosis. Forty patients had a lumbar laminectomy procedure, which preserved the integrity of the neural arches, facet joints and most muscle attachments. Pre-operative clinical evaluation of the patients included: Waddell's non-organic signs (NOS) performed by an independent surgeon observer; three self-report questionnaires--the Waddell Disability Index (WDI), the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI), and the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS); and a general questionnaire that included a visual analog pain intensity scale (VAS). Post-operative clinical evaluations and questionnaires were obtained in 36 subjects (mean age 59.8 years) after a 1.7-year follow-up (range 1-2.6 years). Pre-operative versus post-operative statistical comparisons of the data were performed using adjusted error rates within families of predictors. Successful surgical outcome was defined as an improvement in at least three of the following four criteria: self-reported pain on a VAS, self-reported functional status measured by LBOS, reduction of pain during walking and reduction of leg pain. At follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in VAS pain intensity, ODI, WDI, and LBOS. Patients classified as having mixed stenosis had a higher incidence of continuous pain symptoms in comparison with acquired stenosis, but there was no differential improvement with treatment depending upon stenosis classification and/or number of operative levels. Overall, 58% (21/36) of patients met the successful surgical outcome criteria, including 14 subjects who met all four success criteria. Based upon a stringent definition of successful surgical outcome, the results of a conservative laminectomy were as good as those of more aggressive decompressive procedures presented in the literature. Our findings indicate that, even in a highly organic disorder such as spinal stenosis, illness behavior plays an important role in predicting surgical outcome.
微创减压手术已成为椎管狭窄广泛减压的一种合理手术治疗替代方案。然而,这种保守手术治疗的临床效果尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估腰椎管狭窄保守减压手术后的短期心理测量和功能结果。40例患者接受了腰椎椎板切除术,该手术保留了神经弓、小关节和大部分肌肉附着点的完整性。患者的术前临床评估包括:由独立外科医生观察者进行的瓦德尔非器质性体征(NOS);三份自我报告问卷——瓦德尔残疾指数(WDI)、奥斯维斯特腰痛残疾问卷(ODI)和腰痛结果评分(LBOS);以及一份包含视觉模拟疼痛强度量表(VAS)的一般问卷。在1.7年的随访(范围1 - 2.6年)后,对36名受试者(平均年龄59.8岁)进行了术后临床评估和问卷调查。使用预测变量家族内的调整错误率对数据进行术前与术后的统计比较。成功的手术结果定义为在以下四个标准中的至少三个方面有所改善:VAS上的自我报告疼痛、通过LBOS测量的自我报告功能状态、行走时疼痛减轻以及腿痛减轻。在随访时,VAS疼痛强度、ODI、WDI和LBOS有统计学上的显著改善。与后天性狭窄相比,被归类为混合性狭窄的患者持续疼痛症状的发生率更高,但根据狭窄分类和/或手术节段数量,治疗后的改善没有差异。总体而言,58%(21/36)的患者符合成功的手术结果标准,其中14名受试者符合所有四项成功标准。基于对成功手术结果的严格定义,保守椎板切除术的结果与文献中更积极的减压手术结果一样好。我们的研究结果表明,即使在诸如椎管狭窄这样高度器质性的疾病中,患病行为在预测手术结果方面也起着重要作用。