Moran Steven L, Nava Guillermina, Behnam Amir B, Serletti Joseph M
Department of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Minn 55905, USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 May;111(6):1876-82. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000056872.06003.7E.
The thoracodorsal vessels have been the standard recipient vessels for the majority of surgeons performing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions. Recently, the internal mammary vessels have been recommended as the first-choice recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. This approach requires a shorter pedicle length, allows for central placement of flap tissue, and avoids axillary scarring. The use of the internal mammary vessels may provide for a shorter operative time and a higher-quality aesthetic reconstruction. The authors performed a prospective trial examining the differences in operative and aesthetic outcomes between each recipient site. A prospective trial of 108 consecutive free-tissue transfers was conducted in 100 patients. The first 60 TRAM flap patients were randomized so that 30 flaps were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels and 30 were anastomosed to the thoracodorsal vessels, whereas the recipient vessels for the remaining 40 patients were left to the discretion of the surgeon. Of the 40 nonrandomized patients, 10 patients underwent reconstruction using the internal mammary vessels and 30 patients underwent reconstruction using the thoracodorsal vessels. The patients' medical history and hospital course were noted. To evaluate aesthetic outcome, a group of five blinded nonmedical observers and three blinded plastic surgeons graded the reconstructions in the 60 TRAM flap patients for symmetry and overall aesthetic result on a scale of 1 to 5. Blinded practitioners administered postoperative questionnaires to patients regarding recovery time and satisfaction with the aesthetic result. Forty-three flaps were transferred to the internal mammary vessels and 65 were transferred to the thoracodorsal vessels. No significant differences existed between groups with regard to age of preoperative risk factors. Average operative time was 6 hours in each group. Average hospital stay was 5.8 days in each group. Conversion from initial recipient vessel to a secondary recipient site occurred in 12.5 percent of internal mammary reconstructions and 7 percent of thoracodorsal reconstructions. All converted internal mammary cases occurred in left-sided reconstructions and were attributable to problems with the veins. Overall, 20 percent of left-sided internal mammary reconstructions were found to have an inadequate recipient vein. Unusable thoracodorsal vessels were found only in delayed reconstructions, at a rate of 15 percent in the delayed setting. All flaps from converted procedures survived without complications. Average follow-up was 20 months, during which time there was one flap loss in the thoracodorsal group. There were no significant differences in complication rates between groups. Average aesthetic grade was 3.6 in each group. Postoperative recovery time and overall patient satisfaction were not significantly different between groups. Either recipient site can provide for a safe and acceptable result; however, surgeons should be aware of conversion rates and plan appropriately if recipient vessels appear unusable for free-tissue transfer.
对于大多数进行游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM瓣)重建手术的外科医生来说,胸背血管一直是标准的受区血管。最近,胸廓内血管被推荐为微血管乳房重建的首选受区血管。这种方法所需的蒂长度较短,能使皮瓣组织置于中央位置,且避免腋窝瘢痕形成。使用胸廓内血管可能会缩短手术时间并获得更高质量的美学重建效果。作者进行了一项前瞻性试验,研究每个受区部位在手术和美学效果方面的差异。对100例患者进行了108例连续游离组织移植的前瞻性试验。前60例TRAM瓣患者被随机分组,使得30个皮瓣与胸廓内血管吻合,30个皮瓣与胸背血管吻合,而其余40例患者的受区血管则由外科医生自行决定。在40例非随机分组的患者中,10例患者使用胸廓内血管进行重建,30例患者使用胸背血管进行重建。记录了患者的病史和住院过程。为评估美学效果,一组五名不知情的非医学观察者和三名不知情的整形外科医生对60例TRAM瓣患者的重建效果在对称性和整体美学效果方面进行1至5分的评分。不知情的医生向患者发放术后问卷,询问恢复时间和对美学效果的满意度。43个皮瓣移植到胸廓内血管,65个皮瓣移植到胸背血管。两组在术前危险因素的年龄方面无显著差异。每组的平均手术时间为6小时。每组的平均住院时间为5.8天。胸廓内血管重建中有12.5%的病例从初始受区血管转换至次要受区部位,胸背血管重建中有7%的病例出现这种情况。所有转换的胸廓内血管病例均发生在左侧重建中,且归因于静脉问题。总体而言,发现20%的左侧胸廓内血管重建存在受区静脉不足的情况。仅在延迟重建中发现无法使用的胸背血管,在延迟情况下的发生率为15%。所有转换手术的皮瓣均存活且无并发症。平均随访时间为20个月,在此期间胸背血管组有一个皮瓣丢失。两组之间的并发症发生率无显著差异。每组的平均美学评分为3.6分。两组之间术后恢复时间和患者总体满意度无显著差异。任何一个受区部位都能提供安全且可接受的结果;然而,外科医生应了解转换率,并在受区血管似乎无法用于游离组织移植时进行适当规划。