Zhang Qi, Xiao Qin, Guo Rong, Xiu Bingqiu, Li Lun, Chi Weiru, Gu Yajia, Wu Jiong
Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Gland Surg. 2019 Oct;8(5):477-485. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.08.08.
Internal mammary vessels (IMVs) are widely used recipient vessels in abdominal free flap breast reconstructions. Rib sparing technique is an alternative method with less damage in IMVs exposure. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the selection of IMVs, as well as analyze the applicability and related factors of rib sparing technique in abdominal breast reconstruction.
Medical records of 215 patients who underwent abdominal free flap reconstruction from November 2006 to December 2017 in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) were analyzed. Intercostal space (ICS) was measured from preoperative chest computed tomography scan. Factors influencing the choice of recipient vessels and rib sparing were analyzed. Surgery time, hospitalization and complications were assessed.
Among all 218 flaps, 172 flaps used IMVs as the recipient vessels while 46 used other vessels. patients with immediate reconstruction (P=0.005) and axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) (P<0.001) were less likely to use IMVs. Patients' body mass index (BMI) and radiotherapy history showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P=0.338 and 0.811). In IMVs group, 62% cases used rib sparing technique. Compared with rib resection group, patients with rib sparing were taller (P=0.047) and with a wider ICS (2.65±0.54 2.25±0.38 cm, P<0.001). Rib sparing group had a shorter surgery and postoperative hospitalization time, as well as a lower complication rate, but the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.120, 0.450 and 0.612).
IMVs were used more frequently as the recipient vessels in abdominal free flap breast reconstructions, especially when axillary operation was not performed at the same time. Rib sparing technique had the potential to decrease surgery time, hospitalization days and complications rate. It could be applied in most of the patients with IMVs exposure, particularly in taller patients and patients with a wider ICS. Preoperative chest computed tomography scan can be used to assess the ICS width to provide operational suggestions.
在腹部游离皮瓣乳房重建中,胸廓内血管(IMV)是广泛使用的受区血管。保留肋骨技术是一种在暴露IMV时损伤较小的替代方法。本研究旨在探讨影响IMV选择的因素,并分析保留肋骨技术在腹部乳房重建中的适用性及相关因素。
分析2006年11月至2017年12月在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院接受腹部游离皮瓣重建的215例患者的病历。术前胸部计算机断层扫描测量肋间隙(ICS)。分析影响受区血管选择和保留肋骨的因素。评估手术时间、住院时间和并发症情况。
在所有218个皮瓣中,172个皮瓣使用IMV作为受区血管,46个使用其他血管。即刻重建(P = 0.005)和腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)(P < 0.001)的患者使用IMV的可能性较小。两组患者的体重指数(BMI)和放疗史差异无统计学意义(P = 0.338和0.811)。在IMV组中,62%的病例使用保留肋骨技术。与肋骨切除组相比,保留肋骨的患者更高(P = 0.047),ICS更宽(2.65±0.54对2.25±0.38cm,P < 0.001)。保留肋骨组的手术和术后住院时间较短,并发症发生率较低,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.120、0.450和0.612)。
在腹部游离皮瓣乳房重建中,IMV更常被用作受区血管,尤其是在未同时进行腋窝手术时。保留肋骨技术有可能减少手术时间、住院天数和并发症发生率。它可应用于大多数暴露IMV的患者,尤其是身材较高和ICS较宽的患者。术前胸部计算机断层扫描可用于评估ICS宽度,以提供手术建议。