Suppr超能文献

切除术与姑息治疗:采用术中放疗治疗胰腺III期和IVA期癌

Resection versus palliation: treatment of stage III and IVA carcinomas of the pancreas employing intraoperative radiation.

作者信息

Okamoto Atsutake, Tsuruta Koji, Karasawa Katsuyuki, Miyanari Nobutomo, Matsumoto Gaku, Kamisawa Terumi, Egawa Naoto

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0025, Japan.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2003 May;27(5):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6579-6. Epub 2003 Apr 28.

Abstract

Whether advanced pancreatic carcinomas should be surgically removed has been a basic issue because performing an extended resection is futile if it has only a minimum impact on survival. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of pancreatic resection with those of a bypass operation for patients with stage III or IVA pancreatic carcinomas while applying intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). The therapeutic outcomes of 132 patients who had received IORT for stage III or IVA carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 68 patients with locally unresectable tumors who underwent a bypass operation; group 2 included 64 patients with resectable tumors who underwent pancreatic resection. Postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) was also delivered to 90 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that strong independent predictors of increased survival were EBRT for group 1 ( p < 0.0001) and R0 resection for group 2 ( p = 0.017). Twenty patients who had been subjected to R0 resection showed the best survival, with a 3-year survival rate of 45%. The survival of group 1 patients receiving EBRT ( n = 47) nearly equaled that of group 2 patients undergoing R1 or R2 resection ( n = 44) ( p = 0.72); but group 1 patients with tumors <or= 6 cm ( n = 31) had a better survival rate than group 2 patients with tumors > 3 cm ( n = 28) ( p = 0.03). We concluded that postoperative EBRT is essential for improving the survival outcome, even after administering IORT. Patients with stage III lesions undergoing an R0 resection and receiving IORT demonstrated an excellent 3-year survival. A bypass operation plus IORT in combination with EBRT is preferred over IORT used as an adjuvant to R1 or R2 resection.

摘要

晚期胰腺癌是否应进行手术切除一直是个基本问题,因为如果扩大切除术对生存率仅有极小影响,那么这样做是徒劳的。本研究的目的是比较在应用术中放射治疗(IORT)的情况下,III期或IVA期胰腺癌患者接受胰腺切除术与旁路手术的结果。回顾性分析了132例接受IORT治疗的III期或IVA期癌症患者的治疗结果。患者分为两组:第1组包括68例局部不可切除肿瘤患者,他们接受了旁路手术;第2组包括64例可切除肿瘤患者,他们接受了胰腺切除术。90例患者还接受了术后体外放射治疗(EBRT)。多因素分析表明,生存率提高的强有力独立预测因素是第1组的EBRT(p < 0.0001)和第2组的R0切除(p = 0.017)。20例行R0切除的患者生存率最佳,3年生存率为45%。接受EBRT的第1组患者(n = 47)的生存率几乎与接受R1或R2切除的第2组患者(n = 44)相等(p = 0.72);但肿瘤≤6 cm的第1组患者(n = 31)的生存率高于肿瘤> 3 cm的第2组患者(n = 28)(p = 0.03)。我们得出结论,即使在进行IORT后,术后EBRT对于改善生存结果也是必不可少的。接受R0切除并接受IORT的III期病变患者3年生存率极佳。与将IORT用作R1或R2切除的辅助治疗相比,旁路手术加IORT联合EBRT更可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验