Shyr Yi-Ming, Su Cheng-Hsi, Wu Chew-Wun, Lui Wing-Yiu
Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, 201 Section 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
World J Surg. 2003 May;27(5):606-10. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6841-y. Epub 2003 Apr 28.
This study tried to determine if drainage fluid amylase reflects pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy and to determine the factors affecting the drainage amylase level. Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were recruited. The drainage amylase was measured from postoperative day (POD) 1 to POD 7. Direct evidence of pancreatic leakage was provided by upper gastrointestinal studies using a water-soluble contrast medium and methylene blue dye in the pancreaticogastrostomy group or by pancreaticography with injected contrast medium via an exteriorized pancreatic stent in the pancreaticojejunostomy group on POD 7. A total of 37 patients were recruited. The drainage amylase level was higher than the normal serum amylase (>or= 190 U/L) in more than half of the cases on the initial POD 2 specimen, with a median of 745 U/L on POD 1 and 663 U/L on POD 2. The drainage amylase level was more than three times the normal serum amylase level (>or= 190 x 3 U/L) in 56.8% on POD 1, in 51.4% on POD 2, and in nearly one-third on POD 7 (29.7%). However, no pancreatic leakage occurred in any of the patients with a drainage amylase of >or= 190 U/L. Only one case of pancreatic leakage with a small amount of drainage fluid (10 ml) and low amylase level (74 U/L), was noted. Soft pancreatic parenchyma and a nondilated pancreatic duct were significantly associated with higher drainage amylase levels. In conclusion, biochemical leakage defined by amylase-rich drainage fluid might have no clinical significance and was not necessarily clinical pancreatic leakage following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
本研究旨在确定胰十二指肠切除术后引流液淀粉酶是否能反映胰漏情况,并确定影响引流淀粉酶水平的因素。招募了接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者。从术后第1天(POD)至第7天测量引流淀粉酶。在胰胃吻合术组,于POD 7通过使用水溶性造影剂和亚甲蓝染料的上消化道造影提供胰漏的直接证据;在胰空肠吻合术组,则通过经外置胰管支架注入造影剂进行胰管造影提供证据。共招募了37例患者。在最初的POD 2标本中,超过半数病例的引流淀粉酶水平高于正常血清淀粉酶(≥190 U/L),POD 1时中位数为745 U/L,POD 2时为663 U/L。POD 1时,56.8%的患者引流淀粉酶水平超过正常血清淀粉酶水平的三倍(≥190×3 U/L);POD 2时为51.4%;POD 7时近三分之一(29.7%)。然而,引流淀粉酶≥190 U/L的患者均未发生胰漏。仅发现1例胰漏,引流液量少(10 ml)且淀粉酶水平低(74 U/L)。胰腺实质柔软和胰管未扩张与较高的引流淀粉酶水平显著相关。总之,由富含淀粉酶的引流液定义的生化漏可能无临床意义,不一定是胰十二指肠切除术后的临床胰漏。