Shiro Martha
Universidad Central de Venezuela, Instituto de Filología Andrés Bello, Apartado 6339, Caracas 1010/A, Venezuela.
J Child Lang. 2003 Feb;30(1):165-95. doi: 10.1017/s0305000902005500.
In this study I examine Venezuelan children's developing abilities to use evaluative language in fictional and personal narratives. The questions addressed are: (1) How does the use of evaluative language vary in fictional and personal narratives? (2) Is there a relationship between the use of evaluative language in these two narrative genres and children's age and socio-economic status (SES)? The sample consists of 444 narratives produced by 113 Venezuelan school-age children participating in 4 narrative tasks, in which personal and fictional stories were elicited. Findings suggest that age and socio-economic status have a greater impact on the use of evaluation in fictional stories than in personal narratives. Low SES and younger children are at a greater disadvantage when performing fictional narratives than when performing personal narratives. These results strongly imply that children's narrative competence cannot be assessed in a single story-telling task, given the importance that task-related factors seem to have on narrative abilities.
在本研究中,我考察了委内瑞拉儿童在虚构叙事和个人叙事中运用评价性语言的发展能力。所探讨的问题如下:(1)评价性语言在虚构叙事和个人叙事中的运用有何不同?(2)这两种叙事体裁中评价性语言的运用与儿童的年龄及社会经济地位(SES)之间是否存在关联?样本包括113名参与4项叙事任务的委内瑞拉学龄儿童所创作的444篇叙事作品,这些任务中引出了个人故事和虚构故事。研究结果表明,年龄和社会经济地位对虚构故事中评价性语言运用的影响比对个人叙事的影响更大。社会经济地位较低的儿童和年幼的儿童在进行虚构叙事时比进行个人叙事时处于更大的劣势。鉴于与任务相关的因素似乎对叙事能力有重要影响,这些结果强烈表明,不能在单一的讲故事任务中评估儿童的叙事能力。