Peggs Karl S, Mackinnon Stephen, Williams Catherine D, D'Sa Shirley, Thuraisundaram Dharsha, Kyriakou Charalampia, Morris Emma C, Hale Geoff, Waldmann Herman, Linch David C, Goldstone Anthony H, Yong Kwee
Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003 Apr;9(4):257-65. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2003.50009.
Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens allow application of allogeneic stem cell transplantation to greater numbers of patients with myeloma by reducing transplantation-related mortality. We prospectively evaluated the role of an approach incorporating in vivo T-cell depletion and subsequent adjuvant donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) as part of front-line therapy for chemotherapy-sensitive multiple myeloma. Twenty patients with HLA-matched related (n = 12) or unrelated (n = 8) donors entered the study. None had previously undergone autologous transplantation. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following transplantation was minimal (3 grade II and no grade III or IV). Nonrelapse mortality rate was relatively low (15%) compared with conventional myeloablative allogeneic transplantation series, although it remained significantly higher than in the autologous setting. Disease responses by 6 months posttransplantation were modest (2 in complete remission, 4 in partial remission, 2 were minimally responsive, 6 had no change, 3 had progressive disease, and 3 were not evaluable). Fourteen patients received escalating-dose DLI for residual/progressive disease. Three developed acute GVHD and 2 developed limited chronic GVHD. Seven demonstrated further disease responses, which appeared to be more common in those developing GVHD (5 of 5 versus 2 of 9; P =.02). All responses were associated with conversion from mixed to full donor T-cell chimerism. Response durations were disappointing (5 <12 months) and progression often occurred despite persisting full donor chimerism. Two-year estimated overall survival and current progression-free survival rates (intention to treat with DLI from 6 months) were 71% and 30%, respectively. The current approach incorporating T-cell depletion appears excessively immunosuppressive despite attempts to restore immune function with DLI. Dose escalation failed to allow convincing dissociation of graft-versus-myeloma from GVHD. Attempts to hasten immune reconstitution and to focus and amplify appropriate components of allogeneic T-cell responses will be required to increase complete remission rates and response durations.
减低强度预处理方案通过降低移植相关死亡率,使更多骨髓瘤患者能够接受异基因干细胞移植。我们前瞻性评估了一种方法的作用,该方法包括体内T细胞清除及随后的辅助供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI),作为化疗敏感型多发性骨髓瘤一线治疗的一部分。20例具有HLA匹配的相关供体(n = 12)或无关供体(n = 8)的患者进入本研究。此前均未接受过自体移植。移植后急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)很轻微(3例II级,无III级或IV级)。与传统清髓性异基因移植系列相比,非复发死亡率相对较低(15%),尽管仍显著高于自体移植情况。移植后6个月时疾病缓解情况一般(2例完全缓解,4例部分缓解,2例微小反应,6例无变化,3例疾病进展,3例不可评估)。14例患者因残留/进展性疾病接受了递增剂量的DLI。3例发生急性GVHD,2例发生局限性慢性GVHD。7例显示出进一步的疾病缓解,这在发生GVHD的患者中似乎更常见(5例中的5例 vs 9例中的2例;P = 0.02)。所有缓解均与从混合供体T细胞嵌合转换为完全供体T细胞嵌合有关。缓解持续时间令人失望(5例<12个月),尽管持续存在完全供体嵌合,疾病仍常进展。两年估计总生存率和当前无进展生存率(6个月起接受DLI治疗的意向性分析)分别为71%和30%。尽管尝试用DLI恢复免疫功能,但目前这种包含T细胞清除的方法似乎免疫抑制作用过强。剂量递增未能使移植物抗骨髓瘤作用与GVHD令人信服地分离。需要尝试加速免疫重建以及聚焦和放大异基因T细胞反应的适当成分,以提高完全缓解率和缓解持续时间。