Suppr超能文献

多发性骨髓瘤清髓性异基因干细胞移植的长期疗效

Long-term outcome of myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

作者信息

Kuruvilla John, Shepherd John D, Sutherland Heather J, Nevill Thomas J, Nitta Janet, Le Aulan, Forrest Donna L, Hogge Donna E, Lavoie Julye C, Nantel Stephen H, Toze Cynthia L, Smith Clayton A, Barnett Micheal J, Song Kevín W

机构信息

The Leukemia/Bone Marrow Transplantation Program of British Columbia, Division of Hematology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007 Aug;13(8):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 May 29.

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) has been used in the hopes of harnessing the curative potential of the graft-versus-myeloma effect. This study examines the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients with myeloma who were treated with myeloablative alloSCT at a single center. Comparisons are made with those who were treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Between January 1989 and February 2002, 158 patients age<or=55 years underwent SCT for myeloma. Seventy-two patients underwent myeloablative alloSCT (58 related; 14 unrelated), whereas 86 patients underwent ASCT. Most patients received single-agent high dose dexamethasone or VAD (vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone) therapy pre-SCT. Conditioning regimens were melphalan-based for all ASCT patients, whereas the alloSCT patients received melphalan-based (70%), total-body irradiation (TBI)-based (18%), or other (13%). Patients who underwent alloSCT were younger, had a higher Durie-Salmon stage disease, and a shorter median time from diagnosis to transplant. Myeloma subtypes were similar between groups. Other pre-SCT (BMT) characteristics were similar except that ASCT patients had a higher proportion of cases that received palliative radiotherapy pre-SCT. Disease response pre-SCT was similar. At last follow-up, 61 of 158 patients are alive with a median follow-up of 88.4 months (range: 35.5-208.5). The overall survival (OS) of the alloSCT cohort was 48.1% at 5 years and 39.9% at 10 years compared to 46.2% at 5 years and 30.8% at 10 years for the ASCT cohort (P=.94). The event-free survival of the alloSCT cohort was 33.3% at 5 years and 31.4% at 10 years compared to 32.9% and 15.2%for the ASCT cohort (P=.64). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) at 1 year was 22% for the alloSCT cohort and 14% in the ASCT cohort (P=.21). Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 72% and the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 68% at 2 years. Neither aGVHD nor cGVHD had an influence on OS or event-free survival, although 5 of 14 patients who have received donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) have had disease response. The risk of relapse was reduced in those who developed aGVHD (P=.02) but not cGVHD (P=.23). In conclusion, although there are patient who are alive without disease>10 years post myeloablative alloSCT, similarly there are long-term survivors post-ASCT. Myeloablative alloSCT should not be considered standard treatment, and should only be considered in the context of a clinical trial.

摘要

异基因干细胞移植(alloSCT)已被用于希望利用移植物抗骨髓瘤效应的治愈潜力。本研究调查了一大群在单一中心接受清髓性alloSCT治疗的骨髓瘤患者的长期预后。并与接受自体干细胞移植(ASCT)的患者进行了比较。1989年1月至2002年2月期间,158名年龄≤55岁的患者因骨髓瘤接受了干细胞移植。72名患者接受了清髓性alloSCT(58例为亲属供者;14例为非亲属供者),而86名患者接受了ASCT。大多数患者在SCT前接受了单药大剂量地塞米松或VAD(长春新碱、阿霉素、地塞米松)治疗。所有ASCT患者的预处理方案均以美法仑为基础,而alloSCT患者接受以美法仑为基础的方案(70%)、全身照射(TBI)为基础的方案(18%)或其他方案(13%)。接受alloSCT的患者更年轻,Durie-Salmon分期疾病更高,从诊断到移植的中位时间更短。两组之间的骨髓瘤亚型相似。其他SCT前(BMT)特征相似,只是ASCT患者中接受SCT前姑息性放疗的比例更高。SCT前的疾病反应相似。在最后一次随访时,158名患者中有61名存活,中位随访时间为88.4个月(范围:35.5 - 208.5个月)。alloSCT队列的5年总生存率(OS)为48.1%,10年为39.9%,而ASCT队列5年为46.2%,10年为30.8%(P = 0.94)。alloSCT队列的无事件生存率5年为33.3%,10年为31.4%,而ASCT队列为32.9%和15.2%(P = 0.64)。alloSCT队列1年的治疗相关死亡率(TRM)为22%,ASCT队列为14%(P = 0.21)。2年时II - IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)的累积发生率为72%,慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)的累积发生率为68%。aGVHD和cGVHD均未对OS或无事件生存产生影响,尽管14名接受供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)的患者中有5名出现了疾病反应。发生aGVHD的患者复发风险降低(P = 0.02),但发生cGVHD的患者未降低(P = 0.23)。总之,尽管有患者在清髓性alloSCT后10年以上无病存活,但同样也有ASCT后的长期存活者。清髓性alloSCT不应被视为标准治疗,仅应在临床试验的背景下考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验