Breyer Friedrich, Heineck Martin, Lorenz Normann
Department of Economics, University of Konstanz and DIW, Berlin.
Health Econ. 2003 May;12(5):367-76. doi: 10.1002/hec.757.
In many countries, social health insurance systems are being reformed in favor of more competition among insurers, while premiums are community rated by regulation. The implicit incentives for insurers to engage in risk selection can only be curtailed using appropriate systems of risk-adjusted equalization payments among insurers. To develop these systems, predictors of individual utilization patterns have to be identified, e.g. via regression analysis using previous utilization data. In some countries such as Germany, such data are hardly ever available. In the early nineties, a number of sickness funds participated in an experiment in which individual utilization data were collected. Our data set covers more than 70,000 members of company sickness funds over a 5-year period. We analyze socio-demographic determinants of utilization which could be used as risk adjusters in a risk equalization scheme. Our results suggest that besides age and sex, the set of risk adjusters should include income, family status and a dummy for the last year of life.
在许多国家,社会医疗保险体系正在进行改革,以促进保险公司之间的更多竞争,同时保费由监管部门按社区费率确定。保险公司进行风险选择的内在动机只能通过在保险公司之间采用适当的风险调整均衡支付系统来加以遏制。为了开发这些系统,必须确定个人使用模式的预测因素,例如通过使用以前的使用数据进行回归分析。在德国等一些国家,此类数据几乎无法获取。在九十年代初,一些疾病基金参与了一项收集个人使用数据的实验。我们的数据集涵盖了超过70000名公司疾病基金成员长达5年的情况。我们分析了使用情况的社会人口统计学决定因素,这些因素可在风险均衡计划中用作风险调整因子。我们的结果表明,除了年龄和性别外,风险调整因子还应包括收入、家庭状况以及生命最后一年的虚拟变量。