Lamers L M
Department of Health Policy and Management of the Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1727-44.
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the Diagnostic Cost Group (DCG) model using health survey information.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Longitudinal data collected for a sample of members of a Dutch sickness fund. In the Netherlands the sickness funds provide compulsory health insurance coverage for the 60 percent of the population in the lowest income brackets.
A demographic model and DCG capitation models are estimated by means of ordinary least squares, with an individual's annual healthcare expenditures in 1994 as the dependent variable. For subgroups based on health survey information, costs predicted by the models are compared with actual costs. Using stepwise regression procedures a subset of relevant survey variables that could improve the predictive accuracy of the three-year DCG model was identified. Capitation models were extended with these variables.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: For the empirical analysis, panel data of sickness fund members were used that contained demographic information, annual healthcare expenditures, and diagnostic information from hospitalizations for each member. In 1993, a mailed health survey was conducted among a random sample of 15,000 persons in the panel data set, with a 70 percent response rate.
The predictive accuracy of the demographic model improves when it is extended with diagnostic information from prior hospitalizations (DCGs). A subset of survey variables further improves the predictive accuracy of the DCG capitation models. The predictable profits and losses based on survey information for the DCG models are smaller than for the demographic model. Most persons with predictable losses based on health survey information were not hospitalized in the preceding year.
The use of diagnostic information from prior hospitalizations is a promising option for improving the demographic capitation payment formula. This study suggests that diagnostic information from outpatient utilization is complementary to DCGs in predicting future costs.
利用健康调查信息评估诊断成本组(DCG)模型的预测准确性。
数据来源/研究背景:为荷兰一家疾病基金的成员样本收集的纵向数据。在荷兰,疾病基金为60%收入最低的人群提供强制性医疗保险。
通过普通最小二乘法估计人口统计学模型和DCG人头费模型,将个人1994年的年度医疗支出作为因变量。对于基于健康调查信息的亚组,将模型预测的成本与实际成本进行比较。使用逐步回归程序,确定了一组可提高三年期DCG模型预测准确性的相关调查变量。人头费模型用这些变量进行了扩展。
数据收集/提取方法:为进行实证分析,使用了疾病基金成员的面板数据,其中包含每个成员的人口统计学信息、年度医疗支出以及住院诊断信息。1993年,对面板数据集中的15000人随机样本进行了邮寄健康调查,回复率为70%。
当人口统计学模型用先前住院(DCG)的诊断信息进行扩展时,其预测准确性会提高。一组调查变量进一步提高了DCG人头费模型的预测准确性。基于DCG模型的调查信息预测的可盈利和亏损情况比人口统计学模型的要小。大多数基于健康调查信息预测有亏损的人在前一年没有住院。
使用先前住院的诊断信息是改进人口统计学人头费支付公式的一个有前景的选择。本研究表明,门诊利用的诊断信息在预测未来成本方面是DCG的补充。