Suppr超能文献

包皮环切术中组织胶水与缝线的前瞻性比较。

A prospective comparison of tissue glue versus sutures for circumcision.

作者信息

Arunachalam P, King P A, Orford J

机构信息

Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2003 Apr;19(1-2):18-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-002-0893-1. Epub 2002 Nov 23.

Abstract

The safety of wound closure with tissue glue after surgery has been well established. The efficacy of its use in circumcision is poorly documented. The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative study of tissue glue versus suture closure after circumcision. The duration of the operative procedure, pain score, cosmesis and postoperative complications were evaluated. There were no complications in either group. There was no statistically significant difference in the pain score in both groups. However the mean time taken for tissue glue was 16.6 minutes and the mean time taken for sutures was 23.7 minutes. (p < 0.0001) which was statistically significant. The cosmetic appearance was found to be superior in the tissue glue group as there were no suture marks on the join of the shaft skin and foreskin base.

摘要

术后使用组织胶水进行伤口闭合的安全性已得到充分证实。其在包皮环切术中应用的疗效鲜有文献记载。本研究的目的是对包皮环切术后使用组织胶水与缝合闭合进行对比研究。评估了手术操作时间、疼痛评分、美观程度和术后并发症。两组均未出现并发症。两组的疼痛评分无统计学显著差异。然而,使用组织胶水的平均时间为16.6分钟,使用缝合的平均时间为23.7分钟。(p < 0.0001),具有统计学显著性。发现组织胶水组的美观效果更佳,因为阴茎干皮肤与包皮基部连接处没有缝线痕迹。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验