Hudelist Gernot, Czerwenka Klaus, Kubista Ernst, Marton Erika, Pischinger Kerstin, Singer Christian F
Department of Senology and Ludwig Boltzmann-Institute of Clinical Experimental Oncology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Mar;78(2):193-204. doi: 10.1023/a:1022930710850.
The differential expression pattern of estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha), estrogen receptor beta (ER-beta) and their co-activator/co-repressor proteins is thought to modulate estrogenic action and to be present already during the early stages of tumorigenesis. It has therefore been postulated that certain co-activator and co-repressor proteins contribute to the development of breast cancer. There are some reports providing information on gene amplification and mRNA over-expression of certain co-factors in breast cancer, but to date there is only limited knowledge about their respective protein expressions. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of four steroid receptor co-activators (steroid receptor co-activator 1 (SRC-1), transcription intermediary factor 2 (TIF 2), protein 300 kDa/CREB binding protein (p300/CBP), amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1)), and of the co-repressor nuclear receptor co-repressor (NCoR), in malignant breast tissues and in matching normal breast biopsies of the same individuals. Protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and was compared to prognostic parameters such as lymph node involvement, tumor grading and receptor status. All members of the co-regulatory protein family were detected in both, benign and matching malignant tissue samples, except for AIB1, which was found to be expressed exclusively in malignant epithelium. AIB1 was preferentially present in carcinomas with high tumor grade (r = 0.48, p = 0.014), and was co-expressed with p300/CBP (r = 0.54, p = 0.006). TIF 2 correlated significantly to nodal status (r = 0.46, p = 0.025). Furthermore, protein levels of ER-beta p300/CBP and AIB1 were higher in invasive ductal carcinomas than in normal mammary tissue. The tumoral ER-alpha protein expression was significantly correlated with that of PgR (r = 0.61, p = 0.001) and NCoR (r = 0.4, p = 0.043), whereas ER-beta expression was associated with SRC-1 (r = 0.68, p < or = .001), TIF 2 (r = 0.64, p = 0.001) and NCoR (r = 0.48, p = 0.014) protein levels in malignant specimens. In our hands, 20% of ER-beta positive tumors did not express ER-alpha protein, thereby suggesting that a substantial fraction of ER-beta positive tumors is falsely considered to be 'estrogen receptor negative' if only ER-alpha specific antibodies are employed in the histological assessment of the ER status.
雌激素受体α(ER-α)、雌激素受体β(ER-β)及其共激活因子/共抑制因子蛋白的差异表达模式被认为可调节雌激素作用,且在肿瘤发生的早期阶段就已存在。因此,有人推测某些共激活因子和共抑制因子蛋白有助于乳腺癌的发展。有一些报告提供了关于乳腺癌中某些辅助因子的基因扩增和mRNA过表达的信息,但迄今为止,关于它们各自的蛋白表达的知识仍然有限。本研究的目的是检测四种类固醇受体共激活因子(类固醇受体共激活因子1(SRC-1)、转录中介因子2(TIF 2)、300 kDa蛋白/CREB结合蛋白(p300/CBP)、乳腺癌中扩增的1(AIB1))以及共抑制因子核受体共抑制因子(NCoR)在恶性乳腺组织和同一患者匹配的正常乳腺活检组织中的表达。通过免疫组织化学分析蛋白表达,并与预后参数如淋巴结受累情况、肿瘤分级和受体状态进行比较。除AIB1外,共调节蛋白家族的所有成员在良性和匹配的恶性组织样本中均有检测到,AIB1仅在恶性上皮中表达。AIB1优先存在于高肿瘤分级的癌中(r = 0.48,p = 0.014),并与p300/CBP共表达(r = 0.54,p = 0.006)。TIF 2与淋巴结状态显著相关(r = 0.46,p = 0.025)。此外,浸润性导管癌中ER-β、p300/CBP和AIB1的蛋白水平高于正常乳腺组织。肿瘤性ER-α蛋白表达与PgR(r = 0.61,p = 0.001)和NCoR(r = 0.4,p = 0.043)显著相关,而ER-β表达与恶性标本中的SRC-1(r = 0.68,p≤0.001)、TIF 2(r = 0.64,p = 0.001)和NCoR(r = 0.48,p = 0.014)蛋白水平相关。在我们的研究中,20%的ER-β阳性肿瘤不表达ER-α蛋白,因此表明如果在ER状态的组织学评估中仅使用ER-α特异性抗体,相当一部分ER-β阳性肿瘤会被错误地认为是“雌激素受体阴性”。