González de la Huebra Maria-José, Bordin Guy, Rodríguez Adela R
European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Retieseweg, 2440, Geel, Belgium.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2003 Apr;375(8):1031-7. doi: 10.1007/s00216-003-1801-9. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
A high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method using chromatographic conditions optimised in a previous work was applied for the separation of three macrolide antibiotics roxithromycin (Rox), oleandomycin (Ole) and rosamicin (Ros) and further determination of two of them, roxithromycin (Rox) and oleandomycin (Ole), in human urine samples. A comparative study of the behaviour of these macrolides under the two types of electrochemical detection (EC) widely coupled with HPLC, that is coulometric (EC-C) and amperometric (EC-A), was carried out by applying the same multiresidue method. From the assays performed using both detectors the comparison was made taking relevant criteria such as detection limits, linearity, recovery and precision values into account. As a result of this comparison, the coulometric detector appears slightly more suitable than the amperometric one for macrolide analysis.
采用先前工作中优化的色谱条件的高效液相色谱(HPLC)方法,用于分离三种大环内酯类抗生素罗红霉素(Rox)、竹桃霉素(Ole)和蔷薇霉素(Ros),并进一步测定人尿液样本中的其中两种,即罗红霉素(Rox)和竹桃霉素(Ole)。通过应用相同的多残留方法,对这些大环内酯类药物在与HPLC广泛联用的两种电化学检测(EC)类型下的行为进行了比较研究,这两种检测类型即库仑检测(EC-C)和安培检测(EC-A)。从使用两种检测器进行的测定中,考虑检测限、线性、回收率和精密度值等相关标准进行了比较。作为这种比较的结果,库仑检测器对于大环内酯类分析似乎比安培检测器稍更合适。