Guillory V James, Sharp Glynda
Division of Research, University of Health Sciences, Kansas City, MO 64106, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003 Apr;103(4):176-81.
Although research is a critical component of academic medicine, it has not been a significant component of osteopathic medicine. For years, leaders in the osteopathic medical profession have called for increased research in osteopathic medical schools. The need for cost-effective clinical practice leading to improved clinical outcomes creates a necessity for conducting well-designed clinical outcomes research related to osteopathic practice. The authors assess the growth in research at osteopathic academic medical centers from 1989-1999. The amounts of extramural funding at each school, sources of funding, types of research funded, departments funded, and investigators' degree types are also assessed. During the 10 years analyzed, total research funding increased 37%. Twenty-five percent of the grants and 55% of the funding to colleges of osteopathic medicine were from the National Institutes of Health. Most (63%) grants were awarded to PhD faculty. Most research was conducted in the basic biomedical sciences. Clinical research related to osteopathic practices appears to be a relatively minor component of research at osteopathic medical centers.
尽管研究是学术医学的关键组成部分,但它在整骨疗法医学中并非重要组成部分。多年来,整骨疗法医学专业的领导者一直呼吁在整骨疗法医学院增加研究。对具有成本效益的临床实践以改善临床结果的需求使得开展与整骨疗法实践相关的精心设计的临床结果研究成为必要。作者评估了1989年至1999年整骨疗法学术医学中心研究的增长情况。还评估了每所学校的校外资金数额、资金来源、资助的研究类型、资助的部门以及研究人员的学位类型。在分析的10年中,总研究资金增加了37%。整骨疗法医学院25%的拨款和55%的资金来自美国国立卫生研究院。大多数(63%)拨款授予了拥有博士学位的教员。大多数研究是在基础生物医学科学领域进行的。与整骨疗法实践相关的临床研究似乎是整骨疗法医学中心研究中相对较小的组成部分。