Schwebel David C, Binder Stephanie C, Sales Jessica McDermott, Plumert Jodie M
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294, USA.
J Safety Res. 2003;34(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4375(02)00073-7.
The common view is that clumsy children experience unintentional injury more frequently. Empirical evidence supporting this position is mixed.
One hundred 6- and 8-year-olds completed a battery of nine tasks designed to assess motor ability. Mothers completed a lifetime injury history measure about their children and families completed a 2-week injury diary assessing frequency and severity of daily injuries.
Internal reliability for the motor ability battery was good. Correlations between motor ability measures and injury risk were nonsignificant and near zero.
Motor ability does not appear to be directly related to injury risk. Possible explanations include: (a) coordinated and clumsy children engage in hazardous activities with differing frequency; or (b) other individual difference factors may interact with motor ability to explain children's injury risk.
Children's motor abilities do not appear to be directly linked to rate of unintentional injury, but instead may influence risk for injury in conjunction with other factors. Results could have implications to the engineering of children's toys and playground equipment and to the design of appropriate supervision strategies for children engaging in potentially dangerous activities.
普遍观点认为笨手笨脚的孩子更容易遭受意外伤害。支持这一观点的实证证据参差不齐。
100名6岁和8岁的儿童完成了一系列旨在评估运动能力的九项任务。母亲们填写了一份关于其子女的终生受伤史问卷,家庭填写了一份为期两周的受伤日记,评估日常受伤的频率和严重程度。
运动能力测试组的内部信度良好。运动能力测试结果与受伤风险之间的相关性不显著且接近零。
运动能力似乎与受伤风险没有直接关系。可能的解释包括:(a)协调性好和笨手笨脚的孩子进行危险活动的频率不同;或者(b)其他个体差异因素可能与运动能力相互作用,从而解释儿童的受伤风险。
儿童的运动能力似乎与意外伤害率没有直接联系,而是可能与其他因素共同影响受伤风险。研究结果可能对儿童玩具和游乐场设备的工程设计以及对参与潜在危险活动的儿童制定适当的监督策略有启示作用。