• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新凶手弗朗西斯菌脂多糖在小鼠体内比土拉弗朗西斯菌脂多糖具有更强的免疫生物学活性,并且在新凶手弗朗西斯菌的小鼠致病过程中起作用。

Francisella novicida LPS has greater immunobiological activity in mice than F. tularensis LPS, and contributes to F. novicida murine pathogenesis.

作者信息

Kieffer Tara L, Cowley Siobhan, Nano Francis E, Elkins Karen L

机构信息

Laboratory of Mycobacterial Diseases and Cellular Immunity, Division of Bacterial and Parasitic Products, CBER/FDA, 1401 Rockville Pike, HFM 431, Bethesda, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

出版信息

Microbes Infect. 2003 Apr;5(5):397-403. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00052-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00052-2
PMID:12737995
Abstract

To further understand the role of LPS in the pathogenesis of Francisella infection, we characterized murine infection with F. novicida, and compared immunobiological activities of F. novicida LPS and the LPS from F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS). F. novicida had a lower intradermal LD(50) in BALB/cByJ mice than F. tularensis LVS, and mice given a lethal F. novicida dose intraperitoneally died faster than those given the same lethal F. tularensis LVS dose. However, the pattern of in vivo dissemination was similar, and in vitro growth of both bacteria in bone marrow-derived macrophages was comparable. F. novicida LPS stimulated very modest in vitro proliferation of mouse splenocytes at high doses, but F. tularensis LVS LPS did not. Murine bone marrow macrophages treated in vitro with F. novicida LPS produced IL12 and TNF-alpha, but did not produce detectable interferon-gamma, IL10, or nitric oxide; in contrast, murine macrophages treated with F. tularensis LVS LPS produced none of these mediators. In contrast to clear differences in stimulation of proliferation and especially cytokines, both types of purified LPS stimulated early protection against lethal challenge of mice with F. tularensis LVS, but not against lethal challenge with F. novicida. Thus, although LPS recognition may not be a major factor in engendering protection, the ability of F. novicida LPS to stimulate the production of proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-alpha likely contributes to the increased virulence for mice of F. novicida compared to F. tularensis LVS.

摘要

为了进一步了解脂多糖(LPS)在土拉弗朗西斯菌感染发病机制中的作用,我们对新凶手弗朗西斯菌感染小鼠的情况进行了特征描述,并比较了新凶手弗朗西斯菌LPS与土拉热弗朗西斯菌活疫苗株(LVS)LPS的免疫生物学活性。新凶手弗朗西斯菌在BALB/cByJ小鼠中的皮内半数致死剂量(LD50)低于土拉热弗朗西斯菌LVS,腹腔注射致死剂量新凶手弗朗西斯菌的小鼠比注射相同致死剂量土拉热弗朗西斯菌LVS的小鼠死亡更快。然而,体内传播模式相似,两种细菌在骨髓来源巨噬细胞中的体外生长情况相当。高剂量时,新凶手弗朗西斯菌LPS在体外仅能非常微弱地刺激小鼠脾细胞增殖,而土拉热弗朗西斯菌LVS LPS则不能。体外经新凶手弗朗西斯菌LPS处理的小鼠骨髓巨噬细胞可产生白细胞介素12(IL12)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α),但未产生可检测到的干扰素-γ、白细胞介素10或一氧化氮;相比之下,经土拉热弗朗西斯菌LVS LPS处理的小鼠巨噬细胞则不产生这些介质。与增殖刺激尤其是细胞因子方面的明显差异相反,两种纯化的LPS均能刺激小鼠对土拉热弗朗西斯菌LVS致死攻击产生早期保护作用,但对新凶手弗朗西斯菌致死攻击则无此作用。因此,尽管LPS识别可能不是产生保护作用的主要因素,但新凶手弗朗西斯菌LPS刺激包括TNF-α在内的促炎细胞因子产生的能力,可能导致新凶手弗朗西斯菌相对于土拉热弗朗西斯菌LVS对小鼠的毒力增强。

相似文献

1
Francisella novicida LPS has greater immunobiological activity in mice than F. tularensis LPS, and contributes to F. novicida murine pathogenesis.新凶手弗朗西斯菌脂多糖在小鼠体内比土拉弗朗西斯菌脂多糖具有更强的免疫生物学活性,并且在新凶手弗朗西斯菌的小鼠致病过程中起作用。
Microbes Infect. 2003 Apr;5(5):397-403. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00052-2.
2
Purified lipopolysaccharide from Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) induces protective immunity against LVS infection that requires B cells and gamma interferon.来自土拉弗朗西斯菌活疫苗株(LVS)的纯化脂多糖可诱导针对LVS感染的保护性免疫,这种免疫需要B细胞和γ干扰素。
Infect Immun. 2000 Apr;68(4):1988-96. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.4.1988-1996.2000.
3
Kdo hydrolase is required for Francisella tularensis virulence and evasion of TLR2-mediated innate immunity.Kdo 水解酶对于土拉弗朗西斯菌的毒力和逃避 TLR2 介导的固有免疫是必需的。
mBio. 2013 Feb 12;4(1):e00638-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00638-12.
4
Attenuation and protective efficacy of an O-antigen-deficient mutant of Francisella tularensis LVS.土拉热弗朗西斯菌LVS O抗原缺陷突变株的减毒作用及保护效力
Microbiology (Reading). 2007 Sep;153(Pt 9):3141-3153. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006460-0.
5
Live Vaccine Strain training of murine alveolar and bone marrow-derived macrophages.用活疫苗株对小鼠肺泡巨噬细胞和骨髓来源的巨噬细胞进行训练。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):e0002824. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00028-24. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
6
Perforin- and granzyme-mediated cytotoxic effector functions are essential for protection against Francisella tularensis following vaccination by the defined F. tularensis subsp. novicida ΔfopC vaccine strain.穿孔素和颗粒酶介导的细胞毒性效应功能对于用定义明确的弗氏土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种 novicida ΔfopC 疫苗株接种后预防土拉弗朗西斯菌至关重要。
Infect Immun. 2012 Jun;80(6):2177-85. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00036-12. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
7
An Co-culture Mouse Model Demonstrates Efficient Vaccine-Mediated Control of SCHU S4 and Identifies Nitric Oxide as a Predictor of Efficacy.一种共培养小鼠模型证明了疫苗介导的对SCHU S4的有效控制,并确定一氧化氮为疗效预测指标。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016 Nov 25;6:152. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00152. eCollection 2016.
8
Oral immunization of mice with the live vaccine strain (LVS) of Francisella tularensis protects mice against respiratory challenge with virulent type A F. tularensis.用土拉弗朗西斯菌活疫苗株(LVS)对小鼠进行口服免疫,可保护小鼠免受强毒A型土拉弗朗西斯菌的呼吸道攻击。
Vaccine. 2007 May 10;25(19):3781-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.014. Epub 2007 Feb 26.
9
Live Attenuated Tularemia Vaccines for Protection Against Respiratory Challenge With Virulent subsp. .减毒活土拉弗朗西丝菌疫苗对呼吸道感染强毒. 亚种的保护作用。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 May 15;8:154. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00154. eCollection 2018.
10
Models derived from in vitro analyses of spleen, liver, and lung leukocyte functions predict vaccine efficacy against the Francisella tularensis Live Vaccine Strain (LVS).从脾脏、肝脏和肺部白细胞功能的体外分析中得出的模型可预测对土拉弗朗西斯菌活疫苗株(LVS)的疫苗效力。
mBio. 2014 Apr 8;5(2):e00936. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00936-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycerol monolaurate inhibits growth and is produced intracellularly in an ISG15-dependent manner.月桂酸单甘油酯抑制生长,并以ISG15依赖的方式在细胞内产生。
MicroPubl Biol. 2023 Oct 27;2023. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000905. eCollection 2023.
2
The type IV pili component PilO is a virulence determinant of Francisella novicida.IV 型菌毛组件 PilO 是弗氏柠檬酸杆菌的毒力决定因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 25;17(1):e0261938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261938. eCollection 2022.
3
The Francisella tularensis Polysaccharides: What Is the Real Capsule?
弗朗西斯菌属土拉弗氏菌多糖:真正的荚膜是什么?
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2020 Feb 12;84(1). doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00065-19. Print 2020 May 20.
4
Reveals Niche Differences Between Highly Pathogenic and Closely Related Strains of spp.揭示 spp. 高度致病性和密切相关菌株之间的生态位差异。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 Jun 5;8:188. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00188. eCollection 2018.
5
Glycosylation of a Capsule-Like Complex (CLC) by Is Required for Virulence and Partial Protective Immunity in Mice.荚膜样复合物(CLC)的糖基化对于小鼠的毒力和部分保护性免疫是必需的。
Front Microbiol. 2017 May 30;8:935. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00935. eCollection 2017.
6
Francisella tularensis IglG Belongs to a Novel Family of PAAR-Like T6SS Proteins and Harbors a Unique N-terminal Extension Required for Virulence.土拉弗朗西斯菌IglG属于一类新型的类PAAR六型分泌系统蛋白家族,并具有毒力所需的独特N端延伸。
PLoS Pathog. 2016 Sep 7;12(9):e1005821. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005821. eCollection 2016 Sep.
7
F. novicida-Infected A. castellanii Does Not Enhance Bacterial Virulence in Mice.新凶手弗朗西斯菌感染的卡氏棘阿米巴不会增强小鼠体内的细菌毒力。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016 May 18;6:56. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00056. eCollection 2016.
8
From the Outside-In: The Francisella tularensis Envelope and Virulence.由外而内:土拉弗朗西斯菌的包膜与毒力
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015 Dec 23;5:94. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00094. eCollection 2015.
9
Dissection of Francisella-Host Cell Interactions in Dictyostelium discoideum.在盘基网柄菌中对弗朗西斯菌-宿主细胞相互作用的剖析。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Dec 28;82(5):1586-1598. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02950-15.
10
Differential expression of microRNAs in Francisella tularensis-infected human macrophages: miR-155-dependent downregulation of MyD88 inhibits the inflammatory response.土拉弗朗西斯菌感染的人巨噬细胞中微小RNA的差异表达:依赖miR-155的MyD88下调抑制炎症反应。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e109525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109525. eCollection 2014.