Burt Darren L, DeMello Lesley R
University of Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
J Homosex. 2002;43(2):39-57. doi: 10.1300/j082v43n02_03.
This study examined respondents' perceived level of blame and responsibility for three victims of rape, as a function of attitudes toward homosexuals, and perceived similarity to the victim, as indicative of Shaver's (1970) Defensive Attribution Hypothesis. Victims were a homosexual and heterosexual male, and a female. A sample of 168 university students completed questionnaires, which included three rape scenarios and subsequent questions, the Index of Attitudes Toward Homosexuals (Hudson & Ricketts, 1980), and the short-form Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (Reynolds, 1982). Results indicated that respondents higher in homophobia (regardless of gender) blamed the homosexual male rape victim and the behavior and character of the heterosexual male rape victim, more than the female rape victim. Male respondents in general also blamed the heterosexual male rape victim, more than female respondents. Shaver's defensive attribution hypothesis was not supported. Results are discussed in terms of the possible link between homophobia and male blame.
本研究考察了受访者对三名强奸受害者的感知责备程度和责任,这是作为对同性恋者态度以及与受害者感知相似性的函数,以此来验证沙弗(1970年)的防御性归因假说。受害者包括一名同性恋男性、一名异性恋男性和一名女性。168名大学生样本完成了问卷,问卷包括三个强奸场景及后续问题、同性恋态度指数(哈德森和里基茨,1980年)以及简化版马洛-克劳恩社会赞许性量表(雷诺兹,1982年)。结果表明,恐同程度较高的受访者(无论性别)责备同性恋男性强奸受害者以及异性恋男性强奸受害者的行为和性格的程度,超过了对女性强奸受害者的责备。总体而言,男性受访者也比女性受访者更责备异性恋男性强奸受害者。沙弗的防御性归因假说未得到支持。研究结果从恐同与男性责备之间可能存在的联系方面进行了讨论。