Andersen H J, Pedersen L H, Aarestrup F M, Chriél M
Veterinary Department, Danish Dairy Board, Frederiks Allé 22, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Apr;86(4):1233-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73707-2.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the Danish surveillance program of Streptococcus agalactiae in dairy herds with respect to 1) fluctuation over time of the presence of S. agalactiae in bulk tank milk, 2) sensitivity and specificity of the bacteriological method used, and 3) contamination of bulk tank milk samples with milk from other herds. From June to September 1996, bulk tank milk was sampled from 100 Danish dairy herds seven times, with intervals of 2 wk. The samples were examined for the presence of S. agalactiae by four different methods: 1) by the method approved for the program, 2) after ultrasonic treatment of the milk before examination, 3) after freezing down the milk before examination, and 4) after selective preparation of the milk. Selected strains of S. agalactiae were examined by restriction fragment length polymorphism of the gene encoding rRNA to discriminate between the isolates. Streptococcus agalactiae was found in eight of 96 herds in which S. agalactiae had never previously been found during the surveillance program. Streptococcus agalactiae was not found in all seven sampling rounds in any of the eight herds. Comparing the approved method with supplemental findings by the other methods, the estimated sensitivity was (95% confidence limits): 0.786 (0.628; 0.892) and the estimated specificity (95% confidence limits): 0.995 (0.985; 0.999). Using all four methods on the same sample could increase the sensitivity, but by comparing the methods individually, there was no significant difference between any of them (P > 0.10). In milk samples from three herds, the ribotype of S. agalactiae was the same as in milk from herds sampled just before; therefore, it could not be ruled out that cross-contamination could occur. Taking into account that S. agalactiae in bulk tank milk reflects the presence of S. agalactiae in at least one udder quarter, this investigation gives further reason to assume that S. agalactiae can be seen sporadically in several herds. A surveillance program based on annual bulk tank milk sample examinations will only detect a limited number of S. agalactiae infected herds. If the overall aim is to identify herds where the infection is established, annual bulk tank milk sample examinations combined with the information of number of colonies of S. agalactiae in the sample will be sufficient.
本研究的目的是评估丹麦奶牛场无乳链球菌监测计划,具体涉及以下方面:1)大罐牛奶中无乳链球菌存在情况随时间的波动;2)所用细菌学方法的敏感性和特异性;3)大罐牛奶样本被其他牛群的牛奶污染的情况。1996年6月至9月,从100个丹麦奶牛场采集大罐牛奶样本,共采集7次,间隔为2周。通过四种不同方法检测样本中无乳链球菌的存在情况:1)采用该计划批准的方法;2)在检测前对牛奶进行超声处理;3)在检测前对牛奶进行冷冻;4)对牛奶进行选择性处理。对选定的无乳链球菌菌株进行编码rRNA的基因限制性片段长度多态性分析,以区分分离株。在96个此前在监测计划中从未发现过无乳链球菌的牛群中,有8个牛群检测到了无乳链球菌。在这8个牛群中,没有一个牛群在所有7次采样中都检测到无乳链球菌。将批准的方法与其他方法的补充检测结果进行比较,估计敏感性为(95%置信区间):0.786(0.628;0.892),估计特异性(95%置信区间):0.995(0.985;0.999)。对同一样本使用所有四种方法可提高敏感性,但单独比较这些方法时,它们之间没有显著差异(P>0.10)。在三个牛群的牛奶样本中,无乳链球菌的核糖型与之前采样的牛群牛奶中的核糖型相同;因此,不能排除交叉污染的可能性。考虑到大罐牛奶中的无乳链球菌反映了至少一个乳腺象限中无乳链球菌的存在,本调查进一步表明无乳链球菌可能在多个牛群中偶尔出现。基于每年对大罐牛奶样本进行检测的监测计划只能检测到有限数量的感染无乳链球菌的牛群。如果总体目标是识别已建立感染的牛群,那么每年对大罐牛奶样本进行检测并结合样本中无乳链球菌菌落数量的信息就足够了。