Heisel C, Norman T, Rupp R, Pritsch M, Ewerbeck V, Breusch S J
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69118, Germany.
J Biomech. 2003 Jun;36(6):835-43. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00017-4.
Contemporary cementing techniques in total hip arthroplasty include the use of a cement restrictor to occlude the intramedullary canal. As there are many different designs currently available it was the aim of our study to compare the stability of eight different systems. We investigated the displacement and the ability to occlude the femur of these cement restrictors during standardised cementing of artificial and fresh frozen femora. The maximal intramedullary pressures and the displacement of the plugs were continuously recorded and statistically evaluated. The results revealed significant differences between the tested cement restrictors. The expandable REX Cement Stop and the Exeter Plug achieved the highest stability and the least cement leakage. The more rigid designs (Palacos Plug, BUCK, Universal) in contrast showed inferior performance. Our biomechanical study emphasises the importance of cement restrictor selection, which can have a crucial influence on the fixation of a cemented total hip replacement.
全髋关节置换术中的当代骨水泥固定技术包括使用骨水泥限制器来封闭髓腔。由于目前有许多不同的设计,我们研究的目的是比较八种不同系统的稳定性。我们在人工股骨和新鲜冷冻股骨的标准化骨水泥固定过程中,研究了这些骨水泥限制器的位移以及封闭股骨的能力。连续记录最大髓内压力和塞子的位移,并进行统计学评估。结果显示,测试的骨水泥限制器之间存在显著差异。可扩张的REX骨水泥阻挡器和埃克塞特塞子实现了最高的稳定性和最少的骨水泥渗漏。相比之下,更刚性的设计(帕拉科斯塞子、巴克、通用型)表现较差。我们的生物力学研究强调了骨水泥限制器选择的重要性,这可能对骨水泥固定全髋关节置换的固定有至关重要的影响。