Suppr超能文献

一种使用磁共振图像测量人类正常和骨关节炎膝关节软骨厚度及体积的定量成像系统的可靠性。

Reliability of a quantification imaging system using magnetic resonance images to measure cartilage thickness and volume in human normal and osteoarthritic knees.

作者信息

Raynauld J-P, Kauffmann C, Beaudoin G, Berthiaume M-J, de Guise J A, Bloch D A, Camacho F, Godbout B, Altman R D, Hochberg M, Meyer J M, Cline G, Pelletier J-P, Martel-Pelletier J

机构信息

Montreal Rheumatology Institute, 1551 East Ontario Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2L 1S6.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 May;11(5):351-60. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00029-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a software tool that assesses knee cartilage volumes using magnetic resonance (MR) images. The objectives were to assess measurement reliability by: (1) determining the differences between readings of the same image made by the same reader 2 weeks apart (test-retest reliability), (2) determining the differences between the readings of the same image made by different readers (between-reader agreement), and (3) determining the differences between the cartilage volume readings obtained from two MR images of the same knee image acquired a few hours apart (patient positioning reliability).

METHODS

Forty-eight MR examinations of the knee from normal subjects, patients with different stages of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), and a subset of duplicate images were independently and blindly quantified by three readers using the imaging system. The following cartilage areas were analyzed to compute volumes: global cartilage, medial and lateral compartments, and medial and lateral femoral condyles.

RESULTS

Between-reader agreement of measurements was excellent, as shown by intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficients ranging from 0.958 to 0.997 for global cartilage (P<0.0001), 0.974 to 0.998 for the compartments (P<0.0001), and 0.943 to 0.999 for the condyles(P<0.0001). Test-retest reliability of within-reader data was also excellent, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.978 to 0.999 (P<0.0001). Patient positioning reliability was also excellent, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.978 to 0.999 (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study establish the reliability of this MR imaging system. Test-retest reliability, between-reader agreement, and patient positioning reliability were all extremely high. This study represents a first step in the overall validation of an imaging system designed to follow progression of human knee OA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一种利用磁共振(MR)图像评估膝关节软骨体积的软件工具的可靠性。目标是通过以下方式评估测量可靠性:(1)确定同一读者在相隔2周时间对同一图像进行两次读数之间的差异(重测可靠性),(2)确定不同读者对同一图像读数之间的差异(读者间一致性),以及(3)确定从同一膝关节相隔数小时获取的两张MR图像中获得的软骨体积读数之间的差异(患者定位可靠性)。

方法

由三位读者使用成像系统对48例正常受试者、不同阶段有症状膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的膝关节MR检查以及一组重复图像进行独立且盲法量化。分析以下软骨区域以计算体积:整体软骨、内侧和外侧间室以及内侧和外侧股骨髁。

结果

读者间测量一致性极佳,整体软骨的组内相关系数(ICC)范围为0.958至0.997(P<0.0001),间室为0.974至0.998(P<0.0001),股骨髁为0.943至0.999(P<0.0001)。读者内数据的重测可靠性也极佳,Pearson相关系数范围为0.978至0.999(P<0.0001)。患者定位可靠性同样极佳,Pearson相关系数范围为0.978至0.999(P<0.0001)。

结论

本研究结果证实了该MR成像系统的可靠性。重测可靠性、读者间一致性以及患者定位可靠性均极高。本研究是旨在跟踪人类膝关节OA进展的成像系统全面验证的第一步。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验