Lewis G, Bebbington P, Brugha T, Farrell M, Gill B, Jenkins R, Meltzer H
University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Feb-May;15(1-2):91-6. doi: 10.1080/0954026021000045994.
Evidence on the association between socio-economic status and the prevalence of neurotic disorder is contradictory. We studied the association between three elements of socio-economic status and the prevalence of neurotic psychiatric disorder in a representative sample of adults aged 16-64 living in private households in the UK. A cross-sectional survey of 10,108 adults aged 16-65 resident in private households in the UK was selected by a multi-stage, clustered, random-sampling design. Neurotic disorders were defined using a standardised interview, the revised clinical interview schedule (CIS-R). Data for 9570 people were available for this study. We used housing tenure and access to cars as measures of standard of living; both were associated with the prevalence of neurotic disorder even after adjustment for other socio-economic and demographic variables, including the Registrar General's Social Class and educational attainment. Those people with no access to a car had an odds ratio for neurotic disorder of 1.4 (95% CI 1.1-1.7), compared with those who had access to two or more cars. People who rented their homes were also at increased risk (1.3 [1.1-1.5]). We estimated that about 10% of the neurotic disorder in the UK could be attributed to the increased prevalence of those without cars who rented their homes. There was a complex interaction between the Registrar General's Social Class and sex, and there was no independent association with educational attainment. There is an independent association between low standard of living and the prevalence of neurotic psychiatric disorder. The UK has experienced one of the largest increases in income inequality within western market economies over the past 20 years, and this inequality may have had adverse consequences for the mental health of the population.
社会经济地位与神经症患病率之间的关联证据相互矛盾。我们在居住于英国私人家庭的16 - 64岁成年人代表性样本中,研究了社会经济地位的三个要素与神经症性精神障碍患病率之间的关联。通过多阶段、整群随机抽样设计,对居住在英国私人家庭的10108名16 - 65岁成年人进行了横断面调查。使用标准化访谈即修订后的临床访谈问卷(CIS - R)来定义神经症性障碍。本研究可获取9570人的数据。我们将住房保有情况和是否有车作为生活水平的衡量指标;即使在对包括总登记官社会阶层和教育程度在内的其他社会经济和人口变量进行调整之后,这两者都与神经症性障碍的患病率相关。与拥有两辆或更多辆车的人相比,没有车的人患神经症性障碍的比值比为1.4(95%置信区间1.1 - 1.7)。租房者患病风险也更高(1.3 [1.1 - 1.5])。我们估计,英国约10%的神经症性障碍可归因于无车且租房者患病率的上升。总登记官社会阶层与性别之间存在复杂的相互作用,且与教育程度无独立关联。生活水平低下与神经症性精神障碍患病率之间存在独立关联。在过去20年里,英国是西方市场经济体中收入不平等加剧幅度最大的国家之一,这种不平等可能对民众的心理健康产生了不利影响。