• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用国家邻里指标伙伴关系改善公众健康。

Using the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership to improve public health.

作者信息

Howell Embry M, Pettit Kathryn L S, Ormond Barbara A, Kingsley G Thomas

机构信息

Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):235-42. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200305000-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00124784-200305000-00009
PMID:12747321
Abstract

The National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP), a collaborative effort, uses local information in community building and policy making. A local intermediary in 19 NNIP partnership cities builds local data systems. Partners have learned five important lessons: (1) neighborhood-level data are essential for developing public policy, (2) technological advances have made it possible to maintain detailed local databases at relatively low cost, (3) various types of local organizations can serve as local partners, (4) good leadership is critical to building bridges across agencies, and (5) providing data is only the first step. Data must be used in ways that are visible, useful, and responsive to the community if the project is to succeed.

摘要

国家社区指标伙伴关系(NNIP)是一项合作项目,它在社区建设和政策制定中运用本地信息。19个NNIP伙伴城市中的当地中介机构建立本地数据系统。伙伴们学到了五条重要经验:(1)社区层面的数据对于制定公共政策至关重要;(2)技术进步使得以相对较低的成本维护详细的本地数据库成为可能;(3)各类本地组织可以成为本地合作伙伴;(4)良好的领导力对于跨机构建立桥梁至关重要;(5)提供数据只是第一步。如果项目要取得成功,数据必须以对社区可见、有用且有回应的方式加以运用。

相似文献

1
Using the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership to improve public health.利用国家邻里指标伙伴关系改善公众健康。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):235-42. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200305000-00009.
2
Pennsylvania partners in pursuit of good health: building a shared-responsibility model for state health improvement.宾夕法尼亚州追求健康的伙伴:构建促进全州健康改善的共同责任模式。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 Jan-Feb;10(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200401000-00006.
3
Strengthening the nation's public health infrastructure: historic challenge, unprecedented opportunity.加强国家公共卫生基础设施:历史性挑战,前所未有的机遇。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):15-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.15.
4
The New Hampshire public health network: creating local public health infrastructure through community-driven partnerships.新罕布什尔州公共卫生网络:通过社区驱动的伙伴关系创建地方公共卫生基础设施。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005 Mar-Apr;11(2):150-7. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200503000-00008.
5
Community collaboration--a weaving.社区协作——一种交织。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2002 Jan;8(1):13-20. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200201000-00004.
6
Local public health system partnerships.地方公共卫生系统伙伴关系。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Jan-Feb;120(1):76-83. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000113.
7
Making the most of collaboration: exploring the relationship between partnership synergy and partnership functioning.充分利用合作:探索伙伴关系协同效应与伙伴关系运作之间的关系。
Health Educ Behav. 2002 Dec;29(6):683-98. doi: 10.1177/109019802237938.
8
Building partnerships with the community: lessons from the Camden Health Improvement Learning Collaborative.与社区建立伙伴关系:来自卡姆登健康改善学习协作组织的经验教训
J Healthc Manag. 2000 May-Jun;45(3):189-205.
9
A multistate examination of partnership activity among local public health systems using the National Public Health Performance Standards.采用《国家公共卫生绩效标准》对地方公共卫生系统的伙伴关系活动进行的多州考察。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):E14-23. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31822ca424.
10
Building local and state partnerships in North Carolina: lessons learned.在北卡罗来纳州建立地方和州级伙伴关系:经验教训
N C Med J. 2006 Jan-Feb;67(1):51-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Subcounty Differences in Population Health Using Hospital and Census-Derived Data Sets: The Missouri ZIP Health Rankings Project.利用医院和人口普查数据集衡量县级以下人口健康的差异:密苏里州邮政编码健康排名项目。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):340-349. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000578.
2
Are We Missing the Mark? The Implementation of Community Based Participatory Education in Cancer Disparities Curriculum Development.是否错失良机?社区参与式教育在癌症差异课程开发中的实施。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015 Jun;2(2):237-43. doi: 10.1007/s40615-014-0072-9.
3
Incorporating geospatial capacity within clinical data systems to address social determinants of health.
在临床数据系统中纳入地理空间能力,以解决健康的社会决定因素。
Public Health Rep. 2011 Sep-Oct;126 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):54-61. doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S310.
4
Connecting environmental health data to people and policy: integrating information and mobilizing communities for environmental public health tracking.将环境卫生数据与人和政策相联系:整合信息并动员社区进行环境公共卫生追踪。
J Community Health. 2007 Oct;32(5):357-74. doi: 10.1007/s10900-007-9053-9.
5
Variations in the health conditions of 6 Chicago community areas: a case for local-level data.芝加哥6个社区地区健康状况的差异:地方层面数据的实例
Am J Public Health. 2006 Aug;96(8):1485-91. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.052076. Epub 2006 Jun 29.