Ferlinz J, Herman M V, Cohn P F, Gorlin R
Am Heart J. 1976 Jun;91(6):721-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(76)80537-6.
In order to compare levophase ("forward") ventriculograms to standard (selective) LV cineangiography, 10 patients with coronary artery disease were studied by (1) selective injection of contrast medium into the LV cavity followed by (2) injection into the right ventricle and filming the levophase. Biplane cineangiograms were used to calculate the end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), stroke volume index (SVI), and ejection fraction (EF). Values for the two respective techniques were then compared. Not only were correlation coefficients for the two methods low, but there was also a statistically significant difference between the two SVI (66 +/- 26 ml. for selective and 53 +/- 25 ml. for levophase injection; p less than 0.02) and the two EF (67 +/- 7 per cent for selective and 52 +/- 12 per cent for levophase injection; p less than 0.01). Levophase cineangiograms therefore significantly underestimate the LV ejection fraction when compared to standard (selective) LV cineangiography. These differences must be considered when evaluating greatly divergent interinstitutional survival rates for patients with low EF who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery, and when selecting candidates for bypass surgery on the basis of the angiographic data.
为了将左前斜位(“正向”)心室造影与标准(选择性)左心室电影血管造影进行比较,对10例冠心病患者进行了研究,方法如下:(1) 向左心室腔内选择性注射造影剂,随后 (2) 注入右心室并拍摄左前斜位图像。使用双平面电影血管造影来计算舒张末期容积指数(EDVI)、收缩末期容积指数(ESVI)、每搏量指数(SVI)和射血分数(EF)。然后比较两种技术各自的值。两种方法的相关系数不仅较低,而且两种SVI(选择性注射为66±26 ml,左前斜位注射为53±25 ml;p<0.02)和两种EF(选择性注射为67±7%,左前斜位注射为52±12%;p<0.01)之间也存在统计学上的显著差异。因此,与标准(选择性)左心室电影血管造影相比,左前斜位电影血管造影显著低估了左心室射血分数。在评估接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的低EF患者机构间差异极大的生存率时,以及根据血管造影数据选择搭桥手术候选人时,必须考虑这些差异。