Inquiry finds brains were removed without consent.
作者信息
Mayor Susan
出版信息
BMJ. 2003 May 17;326(7398):1051. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1051.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Inquiry finds brains were removed without consent.
BMJ. 2003 May 17;326(7398):1051. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1051.
2
Human tissue bill.
Bull Med Ethics. 2003(194):22-4.
3
A dispute over brain donations: families allege improper consent in lawsuits against Bethesda institute.
Washington Post. 2005 Jun 30:B1, B5.
4
Whose brain is it anyway? The comparative law of post-mortem organ retention.
J Leg Med. 2005 Dec;26(4):475-90. doi: 10.1080/01947640500364739.
5
Inquiry shows British scientists took brains without families' consent.
N Y Times Web. 2003 May 13:A8.
6
Organ retention for research: the Isaacs Report.
Bull Med Ethics. 2003 Jul(189):18-9.
7
Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey.
Mod Law Rev. 2001 Sep;64(5):710-29. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00347.
8
Beyond organ retention: the new human tissue bill.
Lancet. 2004 Dec;364 Suppl 1:s42-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17637-X.
9
Human tissue legislation: listening to the professionals.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb;34(2):104-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018358.
10
Lessons from cadaveric research in the UK.
Bull Med Ethics. 2003 Jul(189):13-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Post mortem examinations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: challenges and chances.
J Neurooncol. 2011 Jan;101(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0224-7. Epub 2010 May 16.
Zotero 插件