Whose brain is it anyway? The comparative law of post-mortem organ retention.

Klaiman M H

James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona, USA.

J Leg Med. 2005 Dec;26(4):475-90. doi: 10.1080/01947640500364739.

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

J Leg Med. 2005 Dec;26(4):475-90. doi: 10.1080/01947640500364739.

Med Law. 2006 Sep;25(3):427-34.

BMJ. 2001 Jan 20;322(7279):125. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7279.125.

BMJ. 2003 May 17;326(7398):1051. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1051.

Bull Med Ethics. 2003 Jul(189):18-9.

J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb;34(2):104-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018358.

Mod Law Rev. 2001 Sep;64(5):710-29. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00347.

N Z Bioeth J. 2003 Feb;4(1):10-3.

Fam Law Rep. 2004;2:365-439.

Med Law Int. 2000;4(3-4):145-81. doi: 10.1177/096853320000400401.

J Neurooncol. 2011 Jan;101(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0224-7. Epub 2010 May 16.

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。