Spiegel Brennan M R, Targownik Laura, Dulai Gareth S, Gralnek Ian M
Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, CURE Digestive Diseases Research Center, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 20;138(10):795-806. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-10-200305200-00007.
Rofecoxib and celecoxib (coxibs) effectively treat chronic arthritis pain and reduce ulcer complications by 50% compared with nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, their absolute risk reduction is small and the cost-effectiveness of treatment is uncertain.
To determine whether the degree of risk reduction in gastrointestinal complications by coxibs offsets their increased cost compared with a generic nonselective NSAID.
Cost-utility analysis.
Systematic review of MEDLINE and published abstracts.
Patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis who are not taking aspirin and who require long-term NSAID therapy for moderate to severe arthritis pain.
Third-party payer.
Naproxen, 500 mg twice daily, and coxib, once daily. Patients intolerant of naproxen were switched to a coxib.
Lifetime.
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Using a coxib instead of a nonselective NSAID in average-risk patients cost an incremental 275 809 dollars per year to gain 1 additional QALY.
The incremental cost per QALY gained decreased to 55 803 dollars when the analysis was limited to the subset of patients with a history of bleeding ulcers. The coxib strategy became dominant when the cost of coxibs was reduced by 90% of the current average wholesale price. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, if a third-party payer was willing to pay 150 000 dollars per QALY gained, then 4.3% of average-risk patients would fall within the budget.
The risk reduction seen with coxibs does not offset their increased costs compared with nonselective NSAIDs in the management of average-risk patients with chronic arthritis. However, coxibs may provide an acceptable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in the subgroup of patients with a history of bleeding ulcers.
罗非昔布和塞来昔布(昔布类药物)能有效治疗慢性关节炎疼痛,与非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)相比,可使溃疡并发症减少50%。然而,它们降低风险的绝对幅度较小,且治疗的成本效益尚不确定。
确定与普通非选择性NSAID相比,昔布类药物降低胃肠道并发症的风险程度是否能抵消其增加的成本。
成本效用分析。
对MEDLINE及已发表摘要进行系统评价。
未服用阿司匹林且因中度至重度关节炎疼痛需要长期NSAID治疗的骨关节炎或类风湿关节炎患者。
第三方支付方。
萘普生,每日2次,每次500mg;昔布类药物,每日1次。对萘普生不耐受的患者改用昔布类药物。
终身。
每获得1个质量调整生命年(QALY)增加的成本。
在平均风险患者中,使用昔布类药物而非非选择性NSAID,每年每多获得1个QALY需额外花费275809美元。
当分析仅限于有出血性溃疡病史的患者亚组时,每获得1个QALY增加的成本降至55803美元。当昔布类药物成本降低至当前平均批发价的90%时,昔布类药物策略占主导地位。在概率敏感性分析中,如果第三方支付方愿意为每获得1个QALY支付150000美元,那么4.3%的平均风险患者将在预算范围内。
在慢性关节炎平均风险患者的管理中,与非选择性NSAIDs相比,昔布类药物降低风险的效果并未抵消其增加的成本。然而,昔布类药物在有出血性溃疡病史的患者亚组中可能提供可接受的增量成本效益比。