Feldman Howard, Gauthier Serge, Hecker Jane, Vellas Bruno, Emir Birol, Mastey Vera, Subbiah Ponni
Division of Neurology, UBC Hospital, Clinic for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jun;51(6):737-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51260.x.
This study investigated the efficacy of donepezil treatment on activities of daily living (ADLs) and social functioning in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the possible benefits of this treatment on caregiving time and stress levels.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study.
Patients resided in the community or in assisted living facilities who did not require skilled 24-hour nursing care.
Two hundred ninety patients with moderate to severe AD (baseline standardized Mini-Mental State Examination score of 5-17).
Donepezil (5 mg/d for 4 weeks and 10 mg/d per clinician's judgment thereafter) or placebo for 24 weeks.
ADLs were assessed using the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), the modified instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale (IADL+), and the modified Physical Self Maintenance Scale (PSMS+). Caregiver time spent assisting patients with basic and instrumental ADLs was recorded as part of the IADL+ and PSMS+ scales. Patients' social behavior was evaluated through the use of a caregiver diary that captured observations of patients' motivation, interactions, and engagement. Caregivers were evaluated for their levels of caregiver stress with a modified, multiple-item Caregiver Stress Scale (CSS). For each outcome measure, the mean change from baseline at Week 24 using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was calculated.
IADL+ and PSMS+ mean change from baseline scores for donepezil-treated patients showed a slower decline during the study than placebo-treated patients (Week 24 LOCF mean treatment differences: IADL+ = 6.83, P <.0001; PSMS+ = 1.32, P =.0015). Significant differences between the groups in favor of donepezil were observed on the DAD for instrumental and basic ADLs and on the three components required for the completion of each ADL: initiation, planning and organization, and effective performance. At baseline, caregivers of patients treated with donepezil (n = 141) did not differ significantly from caregivers of patients treated with placebo (n = 146) with respect to demographics or mean total scores on the CSS. At Week 24 LOCF, the overall distribution of caregiver ratings on each of the three caregiver diary items favored donepezil-treated patients over placebo-treated patients (P <.005). At Week 24 LOCF, mean change from baseline scores for CSS total and individual domain scores (all domains except caregiving competence, personal gain, and management of distress) were better for caregivers of donepezil-treated patients than for those of placebo-treated patients (CSS total, mean treatment difference = 1.82). Caregivers of donepezil-treated patients reported spending less time assisting with ADLs than caregivers of placebo-treated patients (mean difference = 52.4 min/d).
Donepezil demonstrated a significantly slower decline than placebo in instrumental and basic ADLs in these patients with moderate to severe AD. The ADL benefits in AD patients treated with donepezil were associated with less caregiving time and lower levels of caregiver stress.
本研究调查了多奈哌齐治疗对中度至重度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者日常生活活动(ADL)和社会功能的疗效,以及该治疗对护理时间和压力水平可能带来的益处。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多国研究。
患者居住在社区或不需要24小时专业护理的辅助生活设施中。
290例中度至重度AD患者(基线标准化简易精神状态检查评分5 - 17分)。
多奈哌齐(4周内5mg/天,之后根据每位临床医生的判断为10mg/天)或安慰剂治疗24周。
使用痴呆症残疾评估量表(DAD)、改良的工具性日常生活活动量表(IADL +)和改良的身体自我维持量表(PSMS +)评估ADL。作为IADL +和PSMS +量表的一部分,记录护理人员协助患者进行基本和工具性ADL所花费的时间。通过使用护理人员日记评估患者的社会行为,该日记记录了对患者动机、互动和参与情况的观察。使用改良的多项护理人员压力量表(CSS)评估护理人员的压力水平。对于每个结局指标,使用末次观察结转(LOCF)分析计算第24周时相对于基线的平均变化。
多奈哌齐治疗组患者IADL +和PSMS +相对于基线评分的平均变化显示,在研究期间其下降速度比安慰剂治疗组患者慢(第24周LOCF平均治疗差异:IADL + = 6.83,P <.0001;PSMS + = 1.32,P =.0015)。在DAD的工具性和基本ADL以及完成每项ADL所需的三个组成部分(启动、计划和组织以及有效执行)方面,观察到多奈哌齐组相对于安慰剂组有显著差异。在基线时,多奈哌齐治疗组患者的护理人员(n = 141)与安慰剂治疗组患者(n = 146)在人口统计学或CSS平均总分方面无显著差异。在第24周LOCF时,护理人员日记三个项目中每个项目的护理人员评分总体分布显示,多奈哌齐治疗组患者优于安慰剂治疗组患者(P <.005)。在第24周LOCF时,多奈哌齐治疗组患者护理人员的CSS总分和各个领域评分(除护理能力、个人收获和痛苦管理外的所有领域)相对于基线评分的平均变化优于安慰剂治疗组患者护理人员(CSS总分,平均治疗差异 = 1.82)。多奈哌齐治疗组患者的护理人员报告协助进行ADL的时间比安慰剂治疗组患者的护理人员少(平均差异 = 52.4分钟/天)。
在这些中度至重度AD患者中,多奈哌齐在工具性和基本ADL方面的下降速度明显比安慰剂慢。多奈哌齐治疗AD患者在ADL方面的益处与护理时间减少和护理人员压力水平降低有关。