Suppr超能文献

抗痴呆药物:晚期阶段的证据有哪些?

Anti-dementia drugs: what is the evidence in advanced stages?

作者信息

Ferreira Daniel, Nogueira Noémi, Guimarães Joana, Araújo Rui

机构信息

Departamento de Neurociências e Saúde Mental, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Porto Biomed J. 2024 Apr 29;9(2):251. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000251. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Dementia is a major public health concern due to its increasing prevalence, substantial caregiver burden, and high financial costs. Currently, the anti-dementia drugs aim only at a symptomatic effect. The subject of prescribing these drugs in advanced stages is a matter of considerable debate, with different countries making distinct recommendations. In this review article, we analyzed the evidence regarding cognitive and functional outcomes, adverse events, health-related costs, and caregiver burden in patients with advanced Alzheimer disease (AD) and mixed dementia. We included 35 studies. Most studies are heterogeneous, focus exclusively on AD, and show small benefits in terms of cognitive and functional scales. The overall evidence seems to suggest a benefit in introducing or maintaining anti-dementia drugs in patients with advanced dementia, but clinical meaningfulness is difficult to ascertain. The issue of costs and caregiver burden is significantly underexplored in this field but also seems to favor treatment continuation, despite a reduced overall effect. The decision of introducing or withdrawing anti-dementia drugs in advanced stages of dementia should be individualized. Future studies with homogeneous designs and outcomes are warranted.

摘要

由于痴呆症患病率不断上升、照护者负担沉重且经济成本高昂,它已成为一个重大的公共卫生问题。目前,抗痴呆药物仅旨在产生对症效果。在疾病晚期开具这些药物的问题存在相当大的争议,不同国家给出了不同的建议。在这篇综述文章中,我们分析了有关晚期阿尔茨海默病(AD)和混合型痴呆患者的认知和功能结局、不良事件、健康相关成本以及照护者负担的证据。我们纳入了35项研究。大多数研究具有异质性,仅专注于AD,并且在认知和功能量表方面显示出微小的益处。总体证据似乎表明,在晚期痴呆患者中引入或维持抗痴呆药物有益,但临床意义难以确定。该领域对成本和照护者负担问题的研究明显不足,但尽管总体效果有所降低,似乎也支持继续治疗。在痴呆症晚期引入或停用抗痴呆药物的决定应因人而异。有必要开展设计和结局均同质化的未来研究。

相似文献

1
Anti-dementia drugs: what is the evidence in advanced stages?
Porto Biomed J. 2024 Apr 29;9(2):251. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000251. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
2
3
Withdrawal or continuation of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine or both, in people with dementia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;2(2):CD009081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009081.pub2.
4
5
7
9
Clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs: A revised (third) consensus statement from the British Association for Psychopharmacology.
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Feb;31(2):147-168. doi: 10.1177/0269881116680924. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Cholinesterase inhibitors for vascular dementia and other vascular cognitive impairments: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 22;2(2):CD013306. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013306.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges and progress in research, diagnostics, and therapeutics in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Jul 26;8(1):e12330. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12330. eCollection 2022.
2
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
3
Discontinuation of cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in institutionalised patients with advanced dementia.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 May;29(3):145-150. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002106. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
5
Risk for Health Events After Deprescribing Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Nursing Home Residents With Severe Dementia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):699-707. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16241. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
Memantine for dementia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 20;3(3):CD003154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub6.
8
Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 18;6(6):CD001190. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001190.pub3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验