Baker Robert M, Shah Mamta J, Sclafani Anthony, Bodnar Richard J
Neuropsychology Doctoral Subprogram, Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Boulevard, Flushing, New York, NY 11367, USA.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003 Apr;75(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(03)00039-x.
The effects of dopamine (DA) D(1) and D(2) receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expression of flavor-preferences conditioned by the sweet taste of fructose were examined. Food-restricted rats were trained over eight alternating one-bottle sessions to drink an 8% fructose solution containing one novel flavor (CS+) and a less preferred 0.2% saccharin solution containing a different flavor (CS-). Three groups of rats were treated daily with either vehicle (control group), SCH23390 (200 nmol/kg; D(1) group), or raclopride (200 nmol/kg; D(2) group) during training. Additional groups of vehicle-treated rats had their daily training intakes matched to that of the D(1) and D(2) groups. Preferences were assessed in two-bottle tests with the CS+ and CS- flavors presented in 0.2% saccharin solutions following doses of 0, 50, 200, 400, or 800 nmol/kg of either D(1) or D(2) antagonists. The D(1) and D(2) groups, unlike the control and yoked-control groups, failed to display a significant CS+ preference in the two-bottle tests following vehicle treatment. In addition, treatment with SCH23390 prior to the two-bottle tests blocked the expression of the CS+ preference in the control groups. Pretest raclopride treatment attenuated the CS+ preference at some dose levels. Raclopride also attenuated the preference for fructose in rats given two-bottle training with the CS+/fructose (CS+/F) and CS-/saccharin (CS-/S) solutions. These findings indicate that D(1) and D(2) antagonists block flavor-preference conditioning by sweet taste and that D(1), and to a lesser extent D(2), receptor antagonists attenuate the expression of a previously acquired preference.
研究了多巴胺(DA)D(1)和D(2)受体拮抗剂对果糖甜味条件性味觉偏好的获得和表达的影响。对食物受限的大鼠进行了八次交替的单瓶训练,使其饮用含有一种新口味(条件刺激物+,CS+)的8%果糖溶液和含有不同口味(条件刺激物-,CS-)的较不喜欢的0.2%糖精溶液。在训练期间,三组大鼠每天分别接受溶剂(对照组)、SCH23390(200 nmol/kg;D(1)组)或雷氯必利(200 nmol/kg;D(2)组)处理。另外几组接受溶剂处理的大鼠,其每日训练摄入量与D(1)组和D(2)组相匹配。在给予0、50、200、400或800 nmol/kg的D(1)或D(2)拮抗剂后,通过双瓶测试评估对CS+和CS-口味的偏好,CS+和CS-口味以0.2%糖精溶液呈现。与对照组和配对对照组不同,D(1)组和D(2)组在接受溶剂处理后的双瓶测试中未能表现出对CS+的显著偏好。此外,在双瓶测试前用SCH23390处理可阻断对照组中CS+偏好的表达。测试前用雷氯必利处理在某些剂量水平下减弱了CS+偏好。雷氯必利还减弱了在接受CS+/果糖(CS+/F)和CS-/糖精(CS-/S)溶液双瓶训练的大鼠中对果糖的偏好。这些发现表明,D(1)和D(2)拮抗剂可阻断甜味引起的味觉偏好条件反射,并且D(1)受体拮抗剂以及程度较轻的D(2)受体拮抗剂可减弱先前获得的偏好的表达。