Tosun Fuat, Carrau Ricardo L, Snyderman Carl H, Kassam Amin, Celin Scott, Schaitkin Barry
Department of Otolaryngology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 May;129(5):576-80. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.5.576.
Multiple reports have demonstrated the efficacy of the transnasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks of the anterior cranial base. The literature, however, lacks a comprehensive clinical study specifically addressing the transnasal endoscopic repair of CSF leaks of the sphenoid sinus.
To ascertain the factors that significantly affect the surgical outcome after transnasal endoscopic repair of CSF leaks of the sphenoid sinus.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent an endoscopic transnasal repair of CSF leaks of the sphenoid sinus at our teaching hospitals.
Twenty-four patients with CSF leaks of the sphenoid sinuses that were repaired by the transnasal endoscopic approach were included in our study. Causes of the CSF leaks included trauma, surgery, neoplasms, and idiopathic causes. Obliteration was the most common technique used to repair the CSF fistulas (used in 15 [58%] of 26 procedures). Grafting materials included banked pericardium, mucosa, turbinate bone, and mucoperichondrium placed by underlay or onlay grafting or abdominal fat used to obliterate the sphenoid sinus. Twenty-two patients were successfully treated on the first attempt. A persistent leak in 2 patients with previously unrecognized high-pressure hydrocephalus was repaired during a second endoscopic surgery, quickly followed by ventriculoperitoneal shunting.
Assuming an adequate repair, other factors such as the cause, the size of the defect, the technique and material used to repair the defect, and perioperative management do not affect the surgical outcome significantly. Untreated high-pressure hydrocephalus can lead to a recurrence or persistence of the leaks and should be suspected in patients with posttraumatic, idiopathic, or recurrent CSF leaks.
多项报告已证实经鼻内镜修复前颅底脑脊液(CSF)漏的疗效。然而,文献中缺乏专门针对蝶窦脑脊液漏经鼻内镜修复的全面临床研究。
确定显著影响经鼻内镜修复蝶窦脑脊液漏手术效果的因素。
我们回顾性分析了在我们教学医院接受经鼻内镜修复蝶窦脑脊液漏的所有患者的病历。
本研究纳入了24例经鼻内镜修复蝶窦脑脊液漏的患者。脑脊液漏的原因包括外伤、手术、肿瘤和特发性原因。填塞是修复脑脊液瘘最常用的技术(26例手术中有15例[58%]使用)。移植材料包括库存心包、黏膜、鼻甲骨质以及通过衬里或覆盖移植放置的黏骨膜,或用于填塞蝶窦的腹部脂肪。22例患者首次手术成功治疗。2例先前未识别出高压性脑积水的患者持续存在脑脊液漏,在第二次内镜手术中修复,随后很快进行了脑室腹腔分流术。
假设修复充分,其他因素如病因、缺损大小、修复缺损所用的技术和材料以及围手术期管理对手术效果无显著影响。未经治疗的高压性脑积水可导致脑脊液漏复发或持续存在,对于创伤后、特发性或复发性脑脊液漏患者应怀疑存在这种情况。