Rous Jeffrey J, Hotchkiss David R
Department of Economics, University of North Texas, USA.
Health Econ. 2003 Jun;12(6):431-51. doi: 10.1002/hec.727.
This paper uses the Nepal Living Standards Survey, a nationally representative sample of households from 1996, to investigate the determinants of household out-of-pocket health expenditures. The analysis uses a multi-equation joint estimation to control for endogeneity of sickness and provider choice. The results of this analysis indicate several interesting findings. First, common unobserved factors were found to be statistically significant determinants of illness, choice of provider, and health expenditures, and may cause bias to parameter estimates if not controlled. Second, the income elasticity is estimated to be 1.10, with income having both a direct effect on health expenditure, and an indirect effect through likelihood of illness and the type of provider that is chosen. Third, housing and sanitary conditions were found to have a substantial effect on illness, and as a result, out-of-pocket health care expenditures. Fourth, despite the fact that urban, ill individuals who seek care are more likely to utilize care in more expensive settings, average health care expenditure among the urban sample was found to be substantially lower than among the rural sample, partly due to a lower likelihood of reporting illnesses and injuries and of using any type of health care provider.
本文利用1996年具有全国代表性的尼泊尔家庭生活水平调查,来研究家庭自付医疗支出的决定因素。该分析采用多方程联合估计来控制疾病和医疗服务提供者选择的内生性。这一分析结果显示了几个有趣的发现。首先,发现常见的不可观测因素是疾病、医疗服务提供者选择和医疗支出的统计学显著决定因素,若不加以控制,可能会导致参数估计出现偏差。其次,估计收入弹性为1.10,收入不仅对医疗支出有直接影响,还通过患病可能性和所选医疗服务提供者类型产生间接影响。第三,发现住房和卫生条件对疾病有重大影响,进而对自付医疗保健支出产生影响。第四,尽管在城市中,患病并寻求治疗的个体更有可能在费用更高的机构接受治疗,但城市样本中的平均医疗保健支出却显著低于农村样本,部分原因是城市居民报告疾病和受伤情况以及使用任何类型医疗服务提供者的可能性较低。