Hotchkiss D R, Rous J J, Karmacharya K, Sangraula P
School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 1998 Dec;13(4):371-83. doi: 10.1093/heapol/13.4.371.
His Majesty's Government of Nepal has embarked on an ambitious social welfare programme of increasing the accessibility of primary education and health care services in rural communities. The implications on the financing of health care services are substantial, as the number of health posts has increased twelve-fold from 1992 to 1996, from 200 to 2597. To strengthen health care financing, government policy-makers are considering a number of financing strategies that are likely to have a substantial impact on household health care expenditures. However, more needs to be known about the role of households in the current structure of the health economy before the government designs and implements policies that affect household welfare. This paper uses the Nepal Living Standards Survey, a rich, nationally-representative sample of households from 1996, to investigate level and distribution of household out-of-pocket health expenditures. Utilization and expenditures for different types of providers are presented by urban/rural status and by socioeconomic status. In addition, the sources of health sector funds are analyzed by contrasting household out-of-pocket expenditures with expenditures by the government and donors. The results indicate that households spend about 5.5% of total household expenditures on health care and that households account for 74% of the total level of funds used to finance the health economy. In addition, rural households are found to spend more on health care than urban households, after controlling for income status. Distributing health care expenditures by type of care utilized indicates that the wealthy, as well as the poor, rely heavily on services provided by the public sector. The results of this analysis are used to discuss the feasibility of implementing alternative health care financing policies.
尼泊尔王国政府已着手实施一项雄心勃勃的社会福利计划,旨在提高农村社区的初等教育和医疗服务可及性。这对医疗服务融资产生了重大影响,因为从1992年到1996年,卫生站数量增加了12倍,从200个增至2597个。为加强医疗融资,政府政策制定者正在考虑一系列可能对家庭医疗支出产生重大影响的融资策略。然而,在政府设计和实施影响家庭福利的政策之前,需要更多地了解家庭在当前卫生经济结构中的作用。本文利用1996年具有全国代表性的丰富家庭样本——尼泊尔生活水平调查,来研究家庭自付医疗支出的水平和分布情况。按城乡状况和社会经济地位呈现不同类型医疗服务提供者的利用情况和支出。此外,通过对比家庭自付支出与政府和捐助者的支出,分析了卫生部门资金的来源。结果表明,家庭将约5.5%的家庭总支出用于医疗保健,家庭占卫生经济融资总资金水平的74%。此外,在控制收入状况后,发现农村家庭在医疗保健方面的支出高于城市家庭。按所使用的医疗服务类型划分医疗保健支出表明,富人和穷人都严重依赖公共部门提供的服务。本文利用这一分析结果来讨论实施替代性医疗融资政策的可行性。