Darcy Michael
Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 May;14(5):535-43. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000064862.65229.8a.
Traditionally, embolization has been reserved for treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding whereas lower gastrointestinal (LGI) bleeding has been controlled with vasopressin infusion. This is based on findings in older literature in which infarction frequently complicated LGI embolization. With modern embolization techniques, clinically significant bowel ischemia has become an uncommon complication. Although the efficacies of vasopressin and embolization are fairly comparable, embolotherapy has advantages in terms of quicker completion of therapy and decreased likelihood of systemic complications. Although vasopressin is still probably preferable for diffuse lesions and cases in which superselective catheterization is not technically possible, embolization should be considered a primary option for treating LGI bleeding.
传统上,栓塞术一直用于治疗上消化道出血,而下消化道(LGI)出血则通过输注血管加压素进行控制。这是基于早期文献中的研究结果,在这些文献中,梗死常使LGI栓塞术变得复杂。随着现代栓塞技术的发展,具有临床意义的肠缺血已成为一种罕见的并发症。尽管血管加压素和栓塞术的疗效相当,但栓塞疗法在治疗完成更快和全身并发症可能性降低方面具有优势。虽然对于弥漫性病变以及在技术上无法进行超选择性插管的病例,血管加压素可能仍然是更可取的,但栓塞术应被视为治疗LGI出血的主要选择。