• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种窝沟封闭剂的边缘微渗漏:一项对比研究。

Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a comparative study.

作者信息

Pérez-Lajarín Leonor, Cortés-Lillo Olga, García-Ballesta Carlos, Cózar-Hidalgo Antonio

机构信息

University of Murcia Dental School, Spain.

出版信息

J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Jan-Apr;70(1):24-8.

PMID:12762604
Abstract

PURPOSE

An in vitro study was conducted to evaluate enamel marginal microleakage following acid etching of two fissure sealants of established clinical efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess sealant leakage following etching in combination with the use of latest-generation adhesives.

METHODS

Clinicians removed 22 human premolars without caries for orthodontic reasons, stored them in distilled water, and sealed the occlusal surface. They used sealants Concise (3M) and Dyract seal (Dentsply DeTrey). They randomly distributed the premolars into two groups (N = 11) according to sealant used. The materials were manipulated according to the instructions of the manufacturer, and no invasive enamel preparing technique was used (enameloplasty). Staining was carried out with 2% fuchsin. The results were evaluated by the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test for the comparison of independent data samples.

RESULTS

Concise sealant was seen to produce significantly greater marginal leakage than Dyract seal (P=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of an adhesive layer beneath the sealant afforded less microleakage than when no adhesive was used. Nevertheless despite the possibility of combining adhesives and sealant resins, with good bonding between both components over the entire fissure interface, microleakage was still observed, regardless of the material used. This suggests that presently there is no material is able to secure total sealing of the space between the material used and the dental tissue.

摘要

目的

进行一项体外研究,以评估两种临床疗效已确立的窝沟封闭剂酸蚀后牙釉质边缘微渗漏情况。本研究的目的是评估结合使用新一代粘合剂进行酸蚀后封闭剂的渗漏情况。

方法

临床医生因正畸原因拔除22颗无龋的人类前磨牙,将其储存在蒸馏水中,并封闭咬合面。他们使用了Concise(3M公司)和Dyract seal(登士柏德瑞公司)两种封闭剂。根据所使用的封闭剂将前磨牙随机分为两组(每组n = 11)。材料按照制造商的说明进行操作,未使用侵入性牙釉质预备技术(牙釉质成形术)。用2%品红进行染色。结果通过曼-惠特尼非参数检验对独立数据样本进行比较来评估。

结果

观察到Concise封闭剂产生的边缘渗漏明显大于Dyract seal(P = 0.02)。

结论

在封闭剂下方应用粘合剂层产生的微渗漏比不使用粘合剂时少。然而,尽管有可能将粘合剂和封闭剂树脂结合使用,且两种成分在整个裂隙界面上具有良好的粘结性,但无论使用何种材料,仍观察到微渗漏。这表明目前没有材料能够确保所用材料与牙体组织之间的间隙完全密封。

相似文献

1
Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a comparative study.两种窝沟封闭剂的边缘微渗漏:一项对比研究。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Jan-Apr;70(1):24-8.
2
Microleakage evaluation of a flowable polyacid-modified resin composite used as fissure sealant on air-abraded permanent teeth.在酸蚀恒牙上用作窝沟封闭剂的可流动聚酸改性树脂复合材料的微渗漏评估
Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):267-73.
3
Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel.使用单瓶粘合剂作为中间粘结层以减少唾液污染釉质上的封闭剂微渗漏。
Am J Dent. 2000 Aug;13(4):187-91.
4
Laser and visible light cured pit and fissure sealants--comparison of microleakage at enamel-sealant interface: an in vitro study.激光和可见光固化窝沟封闭剂——釉质-封闭剂界面微渗漏的比较:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2002 Mar;20(1):30-6.
5
Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols.应用于恒牙釉质的封闭剂边缘微渗漏:三种应用方案的评估
Pediatr Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;30(1):29-33.
6
Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants.不同制备技术对复合体和树脂窝沟封闭剂微渗漏的影响。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Sep-Dec;70(3):250-3.
7
Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty.有或没有釉质成形术的封闭剂和复合体材料的边缘封闭性
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002 Jan;12(1):39-46.
8
In vitro evaluation of different techniques of enamel preparation for pit and fissure sealing.窝沟封闭中不同釉质预备技术的体外评价
J Adhes Dent. 2003 Winter;5(4):313-21.
9
Microleakage and sealant penetration in contaminated carious fissures.受污染龋洞中微渗漏及封闭剂渗透情况
J Dent. 2007 Dec;35(12):909-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
10
Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel.封闭剂粘度对树脂渗入酸蚀人牙釉质的影响。
Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):274-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Assessment of Compomers and Ormocers as Pit and Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars among Children Aged 7-9 Years.7至9岁儿童恒牙中复合聚甲基丙烯酸酯和有机陶瓷作为窝沟封闭剂的比较评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jul;17(7):742-747. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2954.
2
Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An Comparative Study.不同类型窝沟封闭剂微渗漏的评估:一项对比研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):535-540. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2436.
3
An Microleakage Study for Comparative Analysis of Two Types of Resin-based Sealants Placed by Using Three Different Types of Techniques of Enamel Preparation.
一项关于使用三种不同类型牙釉质预备技术放置的两种树脂基封闭剂的微渗漏比较分析研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):475-481. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1991.
4
Microleakage of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, a Self-Adhesive Fissure Sealant and a Conventional Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth with/without Saliva Contamination.自粘性可流动复合树脂、自粘性窝沟封闭剂和传统窝沟封闭剂在有/无唾液污染的恒牙中的微渗漏情况。
Front Dent. 2019 Jul-Aug;16(4):239-247. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i4.2082. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.用于窝沟封闭治疗的可流动纳米复合材料与传统材料的体外微渗漏比较
Front Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):21-30. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i1.1105. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
6
Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year.七种封闭剂的有效性:一年后的保留情况
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;12(2):96-100. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1600.
7
Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses.自酸蚀窝沟封闭剂的封闭能力、渗透及适应性的比较评估——体视显微镜和扫描电子显微镜分析
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Jun 1;11(6):e547-e552. doi: 10.4317/jced.55624. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems.自酸蚀窝沟封闭剂与采用全酸蚀或自酸蚀粘结系统的传统窝沟封闭剂微渗漏情况的比较。
Eur J Dent. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):242-246. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18.
9
Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth.传统窝沟封闭剂与自粘结可流动复合树脂作为恒牙窝沟封闭剂的边缘微渗漏情况。
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jun;12(6):430-5.
10
A comparative study of fluoride release from two different sealants.两种不同窝沟封闭剂氟释放量的比较研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Dec 1;6(5):e497-501. doi: 10.4317/jced.51507. eCollection 2014 Dec.