Hasegawa Toshinori, Kondziolka Douglas, Flickinger John C, Germanwala Anand, Lunsford L Dade
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2003 Jun;52(6):1318-26; discussion 1326. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000064569.18914.de.
OBJECTIVE: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) provides benefit for patients with brain metastases but may result in neurological toxicity for patients with extended survival times. Stereotactic radiosurgery in combination with WBRT has become an important approach, but the value of WBRT has been questioned. As an alternative to WBRT, we managed patients with stereotactic radiosurgery alone, evaluated patients' outcomes, and assessed prognostic factors for survival and tumor control. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients with brain metastases were managed with radiosurgery alone. One hundred twenty-one patients were evaluable with follow-up imaging after radiosurgery. The median patient age was 60.5 years (age range, 16-86 yr). The mean marginal tumor dose and volume were 18.5 Gy (range, 11-22 Gy) and 4.4 ml (range, 0.1-24.9 ml). Eighty percent of patients had solitary tumors. RESULTS: The overall median survival time was 8 months. The median survival time in patients with no evidence of primary tumor disease or stable disease was 13 and 11 months. The local tumor control rate was 87%. At 2 years, the rate of local control, remote brain control, and total intracranial control were 75, 41, and 27%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, advanced primary tumor status (P = 0.0003), older age (P = 0.008), lower Karnofsky Performance Scale score (P = 0.01), and malignant melanoma (P = 0.005) were significant for poorer survival. The median survival time was 28 months for patients younger than 60 years of age, with Karnofsky Performance Scale score of at least 90, and whose primary tumor status showed either no evidence of disease or stable disease. Tumor volume (P = 0.02) alone was significant for local tumor control, whereas no factor affected remote or intracranial tumor control. Eleven patients developed complications, six of which were persistent. Nineteen (16.5%) of 116 patients in whom the cause of death was obtained died as a result of causes related to brain metastasis. CONCLUSION: Brain metastases were controlled well with radiosurgery alone as initial therapy. We advocate that WBRT should not be part of the initial treatment protocol for selected patients with one or two tumors with good control of their primary cancer, better Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and younger age, all of which are predictors of longer survival.
目的:全脑放疗(WBRT)对脑转移瘤患者有益,但对于生存期延长的患者可能会导致神经毒性。立体定向放射外科联合WBRT已成为一种重要的治疗方法,但WBRT的价值受到质疑。作为WBRT的替代方法,我们仅采用立体定向放射外科治疗患者,评估患者的治疗结果,并评估生存和肿瘤控制的预后因素。 方法:172例脑转移瘤患者仅接受放射外科治疗。121例患者在放射外科治疗后可通过随访影像学进行评估。患者的中位年龄为60.5岁(年龄范围16 - 86岁)。平均肿瘤边缘剂量和体积分别为18.5 Gy(范围11 - 22 Gy)和4.4 ml(范围0.1 - 24.9 ml)。80%的患者有孤立性肿瘤。 结果:总体中位生存时间为8个月。无原发肿瘤疾病证据或病情稳定的患者中位生存时间分别为13个月和11个月。局部肿瘤控制率为87%。2年时,局部控制率、远处脑控制率和颅内总控制率分别为75%、41%和27%。多因素分析显示,原发肿瘤晚期状态(P = 0.0003)、年龄较大(P = 0.008)、卡氏功能状态评分较低(P = 0.01)和恶性黑色素瘤(P = 0.005)是生存较差的显著因素。年龄小于60岁、卡氏功能状态评分至少为90分且原发肿瘤状态显示无疾病证据或病情稳定的患者中位生存时间为28个月。仅肿瘤体积(P = 0.02)对局部肿瘤控制有显著影响,而没有因素影响远处或颅内肿瘤控制。11例患者出现并发症,其中6例持续存在。在116例明确死因的患者中,19例(16.5%)因与脑转移相关的原因死亡。 结论:仅采用放射外科作为初始治疗对脑转移瘤控制良好。我们主张,对于原发癌控制良好、卡氏功能状态评分较高且年龄较轻(所有这些都是生存期较长的预测因素)的一两个肿瘤患者,WBRT不应作为初始治疗方案的一部分。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004-7-15
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998-10-1
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011-11-11
Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2020-10
Neurooncol Adv. 2019-9-13
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020-5-6
Fed Pract. 2015-10