Suppr超能文献

BRAF和MEK抑制剂联合治疗对转移性黑色素瘤患者的颅内控制

Intracranial Control With Combination BRAF and MEK Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma.

作者信息

Hui Caressa, Wu Yufan Fred, Liu Kevin, Sandhu Navjot, Blomain Erik, Binkley Michael S, Gephart Melanie H, Chang Steven D, Li Gordon H, Reddy Sunil A, Soltys Scott G, Pollom Erqi

机构信息

Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Nov 23;14(11):e31838. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31838. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives Combination BRAF (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, or encorafenib) plus MEK (trametinib, cobimetinib, or binimetinib) inhibitor therapy is now widely used in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, data for intracranial response to these drugs are limited. We aimed to evaluate the intracranial efficacy of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma with brain metastases (BM) and to determine patterns of failure of these new agents to inform optimal integration of local intracranial therapy. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma with metastasis to the brain with at least one untreated brain metastasis at the time of initiation of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors at our institution from 2006 to 2020. We collected per-patient and per-lesion data on demographics, treatment modality, and outcomes. The cumulative incidence of local (LF), distant intracranial (DF), and extracranial failure (EF) were calculated with competing risk analysis with death as a competing risk and censored at the last brain MRI follow-up. LF was calculated on a per-lesion basis while DF and EF were calculated on a per-patient basis. DF was defined as any new intracranial lesions. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors for LF. Results We identified 10 patients with 63 untreated brain metastases. The median age was 50.5 years. The median sum of the diameters of the five largest untreated brain metastases per patient was 20 mm (interquartile range 15-39 mm) and the median diameter for all measurable lesions was 4 mm. Median follow-up time was 9.0 months (range 1.4 months-46.2 months). Median OS was 13.6 months. The one-year cumulative incidence of LF, DF, and EF was 17.1%, 88.6, and 71.4%, respectively. The median time to LF, DF, and EF from the start of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors was 9.0 months, 4.7 months, and 7.0 months, respectively. The larger size of the BM was associated with LF on univariate analysis (odds ratio 1.13 per 1 mm increase in diameter, 95% confidence interval 1.019 to 1.308, p<0.02). Two (20%) patients eventually received stereotactic radiosurgery, and 2 (20%) received whole-brain radiotherapy for intracranial progression. Conclusion Although patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma with BM had fair local control on BRAF plus MEK inhibitors, the competing risk of death and distant intracranial and extracranial progression was high. Patients with larger brain metastases may benefit from local therapy.

摘要

目的/目标 联合BRAF(维莫非尼、达拉非尼或恩考芬尼)加MEK(曲美替尼、考比替尼或比美替尼)抑制剂疗法目前广泛用于转移性黑色素瘤的治疗。然而,关于这些药物颅内反应的数据有限。我们旨在评估BRAF加MEK抑制剂对伴有脑转移(BM)的BRAF突变型黑色素瘤患者的颅内疗效,并确定这些新药的失败模式,以指导局部颅内治疗的最佳整合。材料和方法 我们回顾性分析了2006年至2020年在我们机构开始使用BRAF加MEK抑制剂时患有BRAF突变型黑色素瘤且脑转移至脑部且至少有一处未经治疗的脑转移的患者病历。我们收集了每位患者和每个病灶的人口统计学、治疗方式和结局数据。采用竞争风险分析计算局部(LF)、远处颅内(DF)和颅外失败(EF)的累积发生率,以死亡作为竞争风险,并在最后一次脑部MRI随访时进行截尾。LF按每个病灶计算,而DF和EF按每位患者计算。DF定义为任何新的颅内病灶。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析总生存期(OS)。采用逻辑回归确定LF的预测因素。结果 我们确定了10例患者,有63处未经治疗的脑转移。中位年龄为50.5岁。每位患者最大的5处未经治疗的脑转移直径总和的中位数为20 mm(四分位间距15 - 39 mm),所有可测量病灶的中位直径为4 mm。中位随访时间为9.0个月(范围1.4个月 - 46.2个月)。中位OS为13.6个月。LF、DF和EF的1年累积发生率分别为17.1%、88.6%和71.4%。从开始使用BRAF加MEK抑制剂到LF、DF和EF的中位时间分别为9.0个月、4.7个月和7.0个月。单因素分析显示,较大尺寸的BM与LF相关(直径每增加1 mm,比值比为1.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b1/9788920/00269142e645/cureus-0014-00000031838-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验