Suppr超能文献

双焦点自助小组中的效果调节因素。

Mediators of effectiveness in dual-focus self-help groups.

作者信息

Magura Stephen, Knight Edward L, Vogel Howard S, Mahmood Daneyal, Laudet Alexandre B, Rosenblum Andrew

机构信息

National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003 May;29(2):301-22. doi: 10.1081/ada-120020514.

Abstract

Although research on the effectiveness of 12-step group participation has been increasing, there has been little examination of the processes by which such participation leads to positive outcomes. Two kinds of factors have been proposed as mediating between 12-step group affiliation and outcomes for members, common process factors that have been identified in a range of behavioral treatments and factors that are relatively unique to the 12-step model. The study tested the hypotheses that two common process factors (internal locus of control and sociability) and two unique factors (spirituality and installation of hope) mediate the effects of 12-step group affiliation on drug/alcohol abstinence and health promoting behavior. The study respondents were members of a dual focus 12-step-based fellowship, Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), designed to address issues of both substance use and mental health. Members of 24 DTR groups in New York City were recruited and followed-up for 1 year. The degree of 12-step group affiliation during the study period was associated with more positive outcomes at follow-up. Internal locus of control and sociability mediated the effects of 12-step group affiliation on both outcomes, whereas spirituality and hope acted as mediators only for health promoting behavior. Understanding that the therapeutic factors inherent in 12-step are not mysterious, but appear to capitalize on well-documented social learning principles, may increase the acceptance of 12-step programs among addiction and mental health professionals.

摘要

尽管关于参加12步团体的有效性的研究一直在增加,但对于这种参与导致积极结果的过程却很少有研究。有两类因素被认为是12步团体成员身份与结果之间的中介,一类是在一系列行为治疗中已被确定的常见过程因素,另一类是12步模式相对独特的因素。该研究检验了以下假设:两个常见过程因素(内控点和社交性)以及两个独特因素(灵性和希望的确立)介导了12步团体成员身份对戒毒/戒酒及健康促进行为的影响。研究对象是一个基于12步的双焦点团体“康复中的双重困境”(DTR)的成员,该团体旨在解决物质使用和心理健康两方面的问题。招募了纽约市24个DTR团体的成员并对其进行了为期1年的随访。研究期间12步团体成员身份的程度与随访时更积极的结果相关。内控点和社交性介导了12步团体成员身份对两种结果的影响,而灵性和希望仅作为健康促进行为的中介。认识到12步中固有的治疗因素并非神秘莫测,而是似乎利用了有充分记录的社会学习原则,可能会增加成瘾和心理健康专业人员对12步项目的接受度。

相似文献

1
Mediators of effectiveness in dual-focus self-help groups.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003 May;29(2):301-22. doi: 10.1081/ada-120020514.
3
Role of self-help processes in achieving abstinence among dually diagnosed persons.
Addict Behav. 2003 Apr;28(3):399-413. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00278-7.
5
Dual-focus mutual aid for co-occurring disorders: a quasi-experimental outcome evaluation study.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2008;34(1):61-74. doi: 10.1080/00952990701764623.
6
Social support mediates the effects of dual-focus mutual aid groups on abstinence from substance use.
Am J Community Psychol. 2004 Dec;34(3-4):175-85. doi: 10.1007/s10464-004-7413-5.
7
Predictors of retention in dual-focus self-help groups.
Community Ment Health J. 2003 Aug;39(4):281-97. doi: 10.1023/a:1024085423488.
8
Efficacy of dual focus mutual aid for persons with mental illness and substance misuse.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Feb 1;135:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
9
Effects of "dual focus" mutual aid on self-efficacy for recovery and quality of life.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007 Jan;34(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0091-x.
10
Dual diagnosis subtypes in urban substance abuse and mental health clinics.
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Aug;48(8):1058-63. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.8.1058.

引用本文的文献

1
Involvement in Sexaholics Anonymous and life satisfaction: The mediating role of meaning in life and hope.
J Behav Addict. 2022 May 17;11(2):544-56. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00024.
3
Changes in clients' well-being (ORS) and state hope (SHS) during inpatient substance abuse treatment.
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2020 Aug;37(4):384-399. doi: 10.1177/1455072520922025. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
4
Relationship of hope, sense of community, and quality of life.
J Community Psychol. 2018 Jul;46(5):567-574. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21959. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
5
Web-Delivered CBT Reduces Heavy Drinking in OEF-OIF Veterans in Primary Care With Symptomatic Substance Use and PTSD.
Behav Ther. 2017 Mar;48(2):262-276. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
6
Reducing Economic Disparities for Female Offenders: The Oxford House Model.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2016;34(3):292-302. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2016.1182814. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
7
Characteristics of students participating in collegiate recovery programs: a national survey.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Apr;51:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
8
Preliminary findings on the association between clients' perceived helpfulness of substance abuse treatment and outcomes: does race matter?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jun 1;139:152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
9
12-step interventions and mutual support programs for substance use disorders: an overview.
Soc Work Public Health. 2013;28(3-4):313-32. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2013.774663.
10
Reasons for help-seeking and associated fears in subjects with substance dependence.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2012 Apr;34(2):153-8. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.101784.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to medication regimens and participation in dual-focus self-help groups.
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Mar;53(3):310-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.3.310.
2
Sources of motivation for abstinence: a replication analysis of the reasons for quitting questionnaire.
Addict Behav. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):79-89. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00090-3.
4
To thine own self be true: self-concept and motivation for abstinence among substance abusers.
Addict Behav. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):743-57. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00091-5.
5
Support, mutual aid and recovery from dual diagnosis.
Community Ment Health J. 2000 Oct;36(5):457-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1001982829359.
6
The influence of coping and depression on abstinence from illicit drug use in methadone-maintained patients.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2000 Aug;26(3):399-416. doi: 10.1081/ada-100100252.
8
Recovery challenges among dually diagnosed individuals.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Jun;18(4):321-9. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(99)00077-x.
9
A retrospective look at long-term adolescent recovery: clinicians talk to researchers.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000 Jan-Mar;32(1):117-25. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2000.10400217.
10
Drug treatment and 12-step program participation: the additive effects of integrated recovery activities.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Jan;18(1):65-74. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(99)00020-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验