Thompson Katherine N, McGorry Patrick D, Harrigan Susan M
Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC), Australia.
Schizophr Res. 2003 Jul 1;62(1-2):31-6. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00428-0.
Our study aimed to investigate how recovery styles influence 12-month clinical outcome in first-episode psychosis patients. We hypothesised that patients who use an integrative recovery style would have better outcome than those who seal over. A total of 196 first-episode psychosis patients from the Early Psychosis Intervention Centre (EPPIC) participated in the study. Each patient was interviewed at stabilization of their acute psychotic episode, and then again 12 months later, using an Integration/Sealing-over measure. Our results suggest that recovery style may be a useful predictor of outcome. Integrative patients had better outcome and functioning at 12 months. These results were influenced by diagnosis and, unlike previous studies, recovery style changed over time, suggesting it was not a stable trait. The capacity for recovery style to change challenges the suggestion it is a personality trait and raises the need for psychoeducation and other psychological interventions that could improve outcome.
我们的研究旨在调查康复方式如何影响首发精神病患者的12个月临床结局。我们假设,采用综合康复方式的患者比那些采取封闭方式的患者结局更好。共有196名来自早期精神病干预中心(EPPIC)的首发精神病患者参与了这项研究。每位患者在急性精神病发作稳定期接受访谈,然后在12个月后再次接受访谈,采用综合/封闭测量方法。我们的结果表明,康复方式可能是结局的一个有用预测指标。采用综合方式的患者在12个月时结局更好且功能更佳。这些结果受到诊断的影响,与之前的研究不同,康复方式随时间而变化,这表明它不是一个稳定的特质。康复方式能够改变这一情况对其是一种人格特质的观点提出了挑战,并增加了开展心理教育及其他可能改善结局的心理干预措施的必要性。